Literature DB >> 17144769

Helping one's way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.

Francis J Flynn1, Ray E Reagans, Emily T Amanatullah, Daniel R Ames.   

Abstract

The authors argue that high self-monitors may be more sensitive to the status implications of social exchange and more effective in managing their exchange relations to elicit conferrals of status than low self-monitors. In a series of studies, they found that high self-monitors were more accurate in perceiving the status dynamics involved both in a set of fictitious exchange relations and in real relationships involving other members of their social group. Further, high self-monitors elevated their social status among their peers by establishing a reputation as a generous exchange partner. Specifically, they were more likely than low self-monitors to be sought out for help and to refrain from asking others for help. This behavior provides one explanation for why high self-monitors acquire elevated status among their peers--they are more attuned to status dynamics in exchange relations and adapt their behavior in ways that elicit status. (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17144769     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  20 in total

1.  Social power and approach-related neural activity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Ruud Smolders; David De Cremer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  GOOD HEALTH AND THE BRIDGING OF STRUCTURAL HOLES.

Authors:  Benjamin Cornwell
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2009-01

3.  Receiving support as a mixed blessing: evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes.

Authors:  Marci E J Gleason; Masumi Iida; Patrick E Shrout; Niall Bolger
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

4.  Psychological foundations of human status allocation.

Authors:  Patrick K Durkee; Aaron W Lukaszewski; David M Buss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Philip R Blue; Hongbo Yu; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work.

Authors:  Cameron Anderson; Daron L Sharps; Christopher J Soto; Oliver P John
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contextual modulation of biases in face recognition.

Authors:  Fatima Maria Felisberti; Louisa Pavey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Teasing, taunting, and the politics of politeness: high sociometric status is associated with expectation-consistent behavior.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Christopher Oveis; Maria Logli Allison; Randall C Young; John Tauer; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Competence and Quality in Real-Life Decision Making.

Authors:  Martin Geisler; Carl Martin Allwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pyrrhic victories: the need for social status drives costly competitive behavior.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Philipp J M Golka; David Effelsberg; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.