Literature DB >> 17144743

Free energy for protein folding from nonequilibrium simulations using the Jarzynski equality.

Daniel K West1, Peter D Olmsted, Emanuele Paci.   

Abstract

The equilibrium free energy difference between two long-lived molecular species or "conformational states" of a protein (or any other molecule) can in principle be estimated by measuring the work needed to shuttle the system between them, independent of the irreversibility of the process. This is the meaning of the Jarzynski equality (JE), which we test in this paper by performing simulations that unfold a protein by pulling two atoms apart. Pulling is performed fast relative to the relaxation time of the molecule and is thus far from equilibrium. Choosing a simple protein model for which we can independently compute its equilibrium properties, we show that the free energy can be exactly and effectively estimated from nonequilibrium simulations. To do so, one must carefully and correctly determine the ensemble of states that are pulled, which is more important the farther from equilibrium one performs simulations; this highlights a potential problem in using the JE to extract the free energy from forced unfolding experiments. The results presented here also demonstrate that the free energy difference between the native and denatured states of a protein measured in solution is not always equal to the free energy profile that can be estimated from forced unfolding simulations (or experiments) using the JE.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17144743     DOI: 10.1063/1.2393232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  8 in total

Review 1.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  An experimentally guided umbrella sampling protocol for biomolecules.

Authors:  Maria Mills; Ioan Andricioaei
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Changing the mechanical unfolding pathway of FnIII10 by tuning the pulling strength.

Authors:  Simon Mitternacht; Stefano Luccioli; Alessandro Torcini; Alberto Imparato; Anders Irbäck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A Comparison of Three Perturbation Molecular Dynamics Methods for Modeling Conformational Transitions.

Authors:  He Huang; Elif Ozkirimli; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Pushing the limits of luminescence thermometry: probing the temperature of proteins in cells.

Authors:  Glauco S Maciel
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.560

6.  Strength of hydrogen bond network takes crucial roles in the dissociation process of inhibitors from the HIV-1 protease binding pocket.

Authors:  Dechang Li; Baohua Ji; Keh-Chih Hwang; Yonggang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quantifying Athermality and Quantum Induced Deviations from Classical Fluctuation Relations.

Authors:  Zoë Holmes; Erick Hinds Mingo; Calvin Y-R Chen; Florian Mintert
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Probing the competitive inhibitor efficacy of frog-skin alpha helical AMPs identified against ACE2 binding to SARS-CoV-2 S1 spike protein as therapeutic scaffold to prevent COVID-19.

Authors:  P Chandra Sekar; E Srinivasan; G Chandrasekhar; D Meshach Paul; G Sanjay; S Surya; N S Arun Raj Kumar; R Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.