BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two compounds, URB602 and URB754, have been reported in the literature to be selective inhibitors of monoacylglycerol lipase, although a recent study has questioned their ability to prevent 2-arachidonoyl hydrolysis by brain homogenates and cerebellar membranes. In the present study, the ability of these compounds to inhibit monoacylglycerol lipase and fatty acid amide hydrolase has been reinvestigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Homogenates and cell lines were incubated with test compounds and, thereafter, with either [(3)H]-2-oleoylglycerol or [(3)H]-anandamide. Labelled reaction products were separated from substrate using chloroform: methanol extraction. KEY RESULTS: In cytosolic fractions from rat brain, URB602 and URB754 inhibited the hydrolysis of 2-oleoylglycerol with IC(50) values of 25 and 48 microM, respectively. Anandamide hydrolysis by brain membranes was not sensitive to URB754, but was inhibited by URB602 (IC(50) value 17 microM). Hydrolysis of 2-oleoylglycerol by human recombinant monoacylglycerol lipase was sensitive to URB602, but not URB754. The lack of selectivity of URB602 for 2-oleoylglycerol compared to anandamide hydrolysis was also observed for intact RBL2H3 basophilic leukaemia cells. C6 glioma expressed mRNA for monoacylglycerol lipase, and hydrolyzed 2-oleoylglycerol in a manner sensitive to inhibition by methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate but not URB754 or URB597. MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblastic cells, which did not express mRNA for monoacylglycerol lipase, hydrolyzed 2-oleoylglycerol in the presence of URB597, but the hydrolysis was less sensitive to methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate than for C6 cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The data demonstrate that the compounds URB602 and URB754 do not behave as selective and/or potent inhibitors of monoacylglycerol lipase.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two compounds, URB602 and URB754, have been reported in the literature to be selective inhibitors of monoacylglycerol lipase, although a recent study has questioned their ability to prevent 2-arachidonoyl hydrolysis by brain homogenates and cerebellar membranes. In the present study, the ability of these compounds to inhibit monoacylglycerol lipase and fatty acid amide hydrolase has been reinvestigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Homogenates and cell lines were incubated with test compounds and, thereafter, with either [(3)H]-2-oleoylglycerol or [(3)H]-anandamide. Labelled reaction products were separated from substrate using chloroform: methanol extraction. KEY RESULTS: In cytosolic fractions from rat brain, URB602 and URB754 inhibited the hydrolysis of 2-oleoylglycerol with IC(50) values of 25 and 48 microM, respectively. Anandamide hydrolysis by brain membranes was not sensitive to URB754, but was inhibited by URB602 (IC(50) value 17 microM). Hydrolysis of 2-oleoylglycerol by human recombinant monoacylglycerol lipase was sensitive to URB602, but not URB754. The lack of selectivity of URB602 for 2-oleoylglycerol compared to anandamide hydrolysis was also observed for intact RBL2H3 basophilic leukaemia cells. C6 glioma expressed mRNA for monoacylglycerol lipase, and hydrolyzed 2-oleoylglycerol in a manner sensitive to inhibition by methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate but not URB754 or URB597. MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblastic cells, which did not express mRNA for monoacylglycerol lipase, hydrolyzed 2-oleoylglycerol in the presence of URB597, but the hydrolysis was less sensitive to methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate than for C6 cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The data demonstrate that the compounds URB602 and URB754 do not behave as selective and/or potent inhibitors of monoacylglycerol lipase.
Authors: Satish Kathuria; Silvana Gaetani; Darren Fegley; Fernando Valiño; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Giovanna La Rana; Antonio Calignano; Arcangela Giustino; Maria Tattoli; Maura Palmery; Vincenzo Cuomo; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-12-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Judit K Makara; Marco Mor; Darren Fegley; Szilárd I Szabó; Satish Kathuria; Giuseppe Astarita; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Giorgio Tarzia; Silvia Rivara; Tamás F Freund; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2005-08-07 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Séverine Vandevoorde; Bijali Saha; Anu Mahadevan; Raj K Razdan; Roger G Pertwee; Billy R Martin; Christopher J Fowler Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2005-11-11 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Andrea G Hohmann; Richard L Suplita; Nathan M Bolton; Mark H Neely; Darren Fegley; Regina Mangieri; Jocelyn F Krey; J Michael Walker; Philip V Holmes; Jonathon D Crystal; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nature Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bin Pan; Wei Wang; Jonathan Z Long; Dalong Sun; Cecilia J Hillard; Benjamin F Cravatt; Qing-song Liu Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Victoria Magrioti; George Naxakis; Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina; Alexandros Makriyannis; George Kokotos Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Jonathan Z Long; Weiwei Li; Lamont Booker; James J Burston; Steven G Kinsey; Joel E Schlosburg; Franciso J Pavón; Antonia M Serrano; Dana E Selley; Loren H Parsons; Aron H Lichtman; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2008-11-23 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Devi Rani Sagar; A Gemma Gaw; Bright N Okine; Stephen G Woodhams; Amy Wong; David A Kendall; Victoria Chapman Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 3.395