OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advances in neurosurgical resection techniques, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, malignant gliomas continue to have a dismal prognosis because relapses are unavoidable. METHODS: Dendritic cell vaccination has recently emerged as a promising type of active immunotherapy that aims to induce rather than transfer specific antitumor immune responses in patients. Active immunotherapy is the only type of immunotherapy able to induce immunological memory. RESULTS: Although an increasing number of small clinical trials show safety, feasibility, and immunological and clinical responses, this technology requires further clarification of some critical basic and clinical issues before its presumed place in the treatment of malignant gliomas can be specified. This article addresses the basic and clinical pitfalls that, more than with conventional therapies, may interfere with the potential benefits of this approach. CONCLUSION: Considering the particular mechanisms involved in the immune modulation of tumor biology using dendritic cell-based vaccinations, the authors summarize the arguments in favor of a further, appropriate assessment of this technology.
OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advances in neurosurgical resection techniques, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, malignant gliomas continue to have a dismal prognosis because relapses are unavoidable. METHODS: Dendritic cell vaccination has recently emerged as a promising type of active immunotherapy that aims to induce rather than transfer specific antitumor immune responses in patients. Active immunotherapy is the only type of immunotherapy able to induce immunological memory. RESULTS: Although an increasing number of small clinical trials show safety, feasibility, and immunological and clinical responses, this technology requires further clarification of some critical basic and clinical issues before its presumed place in the treatment of malignant gliomas can be specified. This article addresses the basic and clinical pitfalls that, more than with conventional therapies, may interfere with the potential benefits of this approach. CONCLUSION: Considering the particular mechanisms involved in the immune modulation of tumor biology using dendritic cell-based vaccinations, the authors summarize the arguments in favor of a further, appropriate assessment of this technology.
Authors: Michael R Olin; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Brian M Andersen; Rob Shaver; Nate N Waldron; Christopher L Moertel Journal: Crit Rev Immunol Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Joost Dejaegher; Lien Solie; Zoé Hunin; Raf Sciot; David Capper; Christin Siewert; Sofie Van Cauter; Guido Wilms; Johan van Loon; Nadine Ectors; Steffen Fieuws; Stefan M Pfister; Stefaan W Van Gool; Steven De Vleeschouwer Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Matej Vrabec; Sofie Van Cauter; Uwe Himmelreich; Stefaan W Van Gool; Stefan Sunaert; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Dušan Suput; Philippe Demaerel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Wim Maes; Georgina Galicia Rosas; Bert Verbinnen; Louis Boon; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Jan L Ceuppens; Stefaan W Van Gool Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Joannes F M Jacobs; Albert J Idema; Kalijn F Bol; Stefan Nierkens; Oliver M Grauer; Pieter Wesseling; J André Grotenhuis; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; I Jolanda M de Vries; Gosse J Adema Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jian Gang Zhang; Carol A Kruse; Lara Driggers; Neil Hoa; Jeffrey Wisoff; Jeffrey C Allen; David Zagzag; Elizabeth W Newcomb; Martin R Jadus Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 4.130