Literature DB >> 17143021

Osteoporosis among male Saudi Arabs: a pilot study.

Mir Sadat-Ali1, AbdulMohsen AlElq.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little attention has been paid to the problem of male osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia. In this prospective study we assessed the prevalence of male osteoporosis among Saudi Arabs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied Saudi Arabian males >50 years of age attending outpatient clinics at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, between 1 May 2005 and 30 January 2006. We determined body mass index (BMI) and tests were done to rule out secondary osteoporosis. All subjects had a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the hip area and the lumbar spine using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). A T-score of < or = -2.5 SD that of young, healthy adults was taken as osteoporotic and scores between -1 to -2.5 SD were taken as osteopenic.
RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients (mean age, 61.8+/-0.75 years; range, 50 to 76 years) had a mean BMI of 24.7+/-0.35 (range, 18.5 to 31). Based on hip scans, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 24.3%. Sixty- four percent were osteopenic. Based on scans of the lumbar spine, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 37.4% and 33.9% were osteopenic. Spinal osteoporosis was more common than hip osteoporosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the prevalence of osteoporosis among Saudi Arabian males is higher than among Western males. More studies are needed to determine the national prevalence of male osteoporosis. It is recommended that serious measures to be undertaken to prevent male osteoporosis to stop any future epidemic of catastrophic osteoporosis-related fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143021      PMCID: PMC6074334          DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2006.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.526


Osteoporosis is simply weakness in the bone due to an imbalance between bone formation and resorption. This leads to architectural failure on minimal trauma, causing a fracture. According to the World Health Organization, 55% of the people over the age of 50 years in the USA suffer from osteoporosis.1 Initial studies focused on postmenopausal women as the main group suffering from osteoporosis due to cessation of estrogen at menopause. Reports indicate an incidence of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) of 30% to 40% with over 60% having some degree of osteopenia.2 In Saudi Arabian women the incidence of PMO is reportedly higher in comparison to women in Western countries.3–7 Early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis can prevent osteoporosis-related fractures (ORF), thus decreasing morbidity and mortality in those who suffer from osteoporosis. The prevalence of PMO among Saudi Arabian females was underestimated in the past. It took the arrival of the new millennium to accept the reality. The situation appears similar in studying the prevalence of osteoporosis among the male population of Saudi Arabia. In the midst of all the attention given to PMO and its related complications it was never envisaged that osteoporosis among males could become a future problem. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the prevalence of osteoporosis among Saudi Arabian males over the age of 50 years, using bone mineral density measurements.

Subjects and Methods

This study was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia between 1 May 2005 and 30 January 2006. Saudi Arabian males older than 50 years of age, attending outpatient orthopedic and internal medicine clinics, every second male patient over the age of 50 years was screened for osteoporosis by BMD measurement. After obtaining verbal consent to participation, a detailed history was recorded with emphasis on previous fractures, diseases and the present complaint for which the patient was attending the clinic. Weight and height was recorded to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Investigations to rule out secondary causes of osteoporosis included a complete blood picture and serum calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), leutinizing hormone (LH), testosterone and estrogen levels. The BMD of the hip and the lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The data were entered in the database and analyzed using the SPSS package. Patients with a T-score of ≤−2.5 standard deviations from the mean for healthy, young adults were taken as osteoporotic and those between −1 to −2.5 SD were taken as osteopenic for assessment of fracture risk.1

Results

We were able to analyze the data of 115 patients, who had an average age of 61.8±0.75 years (range, 50 to 76 years) and a mean BMI of 24.7±0.35 (range, 18.5 to 31). Analysis of the scans of the hip revealed that 28 (24.3%) of the subjects were osteoporotic, with an average BMD of 0.786±0.01 g/cm2 (range, 0.724 to 0.0.821 g/cm2) and a mean T-score of −3.06±0.04 (−2.9 to −3.2). Sixty-four (55.6%) were osteopenic, with an average BMD of 0.922±0.012 g/cm2 (range, 0.836 to 1.051 g/cm2) and a mean T-score of −1.83±0.06 (range, −1.1 to −2.5) (Table 1). Analysis of BMD of the lumbar spine showed that 43 (37.4%) had osteoporosis, with a mean T-score of −3.45±0.28 (range, −2.7 to −5.1) and 39 (33.9%) were osteopenic with a T-score of −1.78±0.07 (−1.0 to −2.5) (Table 2). Spinal osteoporosis was more common than osteoporosis in the hip region (37.4% versus 24.3%). Figures 1 and 2 show two typical DEXA scans.
Table 1

Demographic data and BMD of the hip for 115 Saudi males.

Normal (Group A)Osteopenic (Group B)Osteoporotic (Group C)P value
Number of subjects (%)23 (20.1)64 (55.6)28 (24.3)
Age60.6±4.3 (55 to 70)60.2±6.5 (51 to 70)65.2±8.8 (50 to 76)NS
BMI27.1±4.2 (20 to 30.9)24.3±3.4 (18.5 to 34.5)23.6±3.4 (18.4 to 28.9)Between Group A and B: P<0.01Group A and C: P<0.001
Screened area in centimeters36.6±2.6 (33.3 to 40.6)34.3±3.1 (26.7 to 41.8)38.2±9.9 (26.7 to 61.3)NS
BMC g/cm38.2±5.8 (31.2 to 50.5)32.4±2.9 (21.9 to 39.4)32.9±6.1 (18.2 to 50.1)Between Group A and B: P<0.01.Group A and C: P<0.001
BMD g/cm21.052±0.107 (0.927 to 1.3260.936±0.050 (0.863 to 1.065)0.837±0.040 (0.697 to 0.936)Between Group A and B: P<0.01.Group B and C: P<0.001
T-score0.43±0.66 (−1.0 to 0.8)−1.6±0.36 (−1.1- to 2.5)−2.8±0.27 (−2.5 to −3.4)Not tested
Z-score0.53±1.02 (−0.9 to 2.8)−0.65±0.62 (0.9 to −2.3)−1.2±0.63 (−1 to −2.3)Not tested

Values are mean±standard deviation and range. BMI = body mass index, BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density

Table 2

Demographic data and BMD of the spine for 115 Saudi males.

Normal (Group A)Osteopenic (Group B)Osteoporotic (Group C)P value
Number of subjects (%)26 (20.5)47 (37)54 (42.5)
Age60.0±4.06 (55 to 70)59.9±6.82 (51 to 72)63.2±8.2 (50 to 76)NS
BMI27.4±3.1 (20.5 to 31.5)25.3±3.6 (19.5 to 35.5)22.7±3.0 (18.4 to 28.9)Between Group A and B: P was NSGroup A and C: P<0.001
Area screened In centimeters65.9±4.1 (60.4 to 75.0)61.5±6.0 (49.3 to 71.5)57.5±5.6 (47.1 to 67.7)NS
BMC g/cm69.4±5.1 (61.1 to 76.9)59.0±2.9 (41.5 to 72.9)44.7±9.2 (29.9 to 56.8)Between Group A and B: P<0.01.Group A and C: P<0.001
BMD g/cm21.063±0.040 (1.006 to 1.123)0.956±0.050 (0.862 to 1.050)0.765±0.10 (0.527 to 0.931)Between Group A and B: P<0.01.Group B and C: P<0.001
T-score−0.4±0.52 (0.3 to −1)−1.9±0.33 (−1.3 to −2.5)−3.4±0.74 (−2.7 to −5.1)Not tested
Z-score0.45±0.48 (−0.2 to −1)−1.04±0.34 (−03 to −1.6)−2.14±0.89 (−1.5 to −4.8)Not tested

Values are mean±standard deviation and range. BMI = body mass index, BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density

Figure 1

DEXA scan of a 67-year-old Saudi male with osteoporosis.

Figure 2

DEXA Scan of a 56-year-old Saudi male with osteoporosis.

Discussion

Osteoporosis is a major health care problem in developed and developing countries. Western nations spend billions of dollars on the complications of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The focus until now has been on postmenopausal women without realization that males can also develop osteoporosis to the extent that fractures occur.8–10 Looker and his associates11 assessed the incidence of osteoporosis in men and reported that men suffer from osteoporosis in the range of 3% to 6% and osteopenia up to 47%. In this study we found that 27.6% of Saudi Arabian men with an average age of 60 years suffered from osteoporosis and 57.5% were osteopenic, which is significantly higher in comparison to their counterparts in the Western world. In 2004, the Osteoporosis Working Group at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center recommended that once osteoporosis is diagnosed in men, secondary causes need to be excluded.12 Our study population might appear to be a selective hospital group of patients, but every attempt was made to exclude secondary osteoporosis by means of a detailed history, clinical examination and relevant investigations. The objective of early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis is to prevent low trauma fractures. It is estimated that the lifetime risk of fracture at 50 years is 17% to 22.5% in women and 6% to 11% in men,13–14 with higher rates of hospitalization and institutionalization after osteoporotic fractures in men than in women.15 It has been projected that the incidence of hip fractures by 2050 will range between 7 to 21.3 million and men will have more fractures than women.16 Poor and his associates17 found that inactivity and obesity increase the risk of fractures in men many-fold, and Kanis and colleagues, after the MEDOS study, reported that low exposure to sunlight and decreased physical activity were the highest attributable risk factors for fractures.18 At present, the incidence of ORF is low in men but the 12-month mortality in men after ORF is twice that of women.19–20 Thus, it appears that the risk of osteoporosis in women got more attention and that the risk of osteoporosis in men has been neglected, even though the morbidity and mortality in men remains higher. In Saudi Arabia the problem of postmenopausal osteoporosis took over a decade and a half to be acknowledged, as Sadat-Ali et al21 suggested in 1992 that there was a high prevalence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and a high incidence of ORF. This clinical study is probably the first study to report on osteoporosis in men of older than 50 years, showing the reluctance of physicians in Saudi Arabia to study male osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia. The population in Saudi Arabia is aging and in the coming decades the percentage of elderly men and women will increase thereby increasing the population at risk for developing osteoporosis and ORFs. In conclusion, we believe that the prevalence of osteoporosis in Saudi men is higher than in men in the Western world. More needs to be done in advocating prevention by avoiding risk factors like sedentary lifestyle, non-exposure to sunlight, and cigarette smoking. Patients who are already osteoporotic and osteopenic should be adequately treated to reduce or prevent osteoporosis-related fractures.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone mineral density measurements of distal radius in Saudi Arabian females.

Authors:  M Sadat-Ali; I Al-Habdan; S Marwah
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.526

3.  Race and sex differences in mortality following fracture of the hip.

Authors:  S J Jacobsen; J Goldberg; T P Miles; J A Brody; W Stiers; A A Rimm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III.

Authors:  A C Looker; E S Orwoll; C C Johnston; R L Lindsay; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M S Calvo; T B Harris; S P Heyse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Lifetime risk of hip fractures is underestimated.

Authors:  A Oden; A Dawson; W Dere; O Johnell; B Jonsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Prevention of osteoporosis and fractures.

Authors:  P Ullom-Minnich
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.292

7.  Effect of parity on bone mineral density among postmenopausal Saudi Arabian women.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Ibrahim Al-Habdan; Abdul-Aziz Al-Mulhim; Abdallah Y El-Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Osteoporosis in postmenopausal Saudi women using dual x-ray bone densitometry.

Authors:  Mahmoud I El-Desouki
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Bone mineral density among postmenopausal Saudi women.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Ibrahim M Al-Habdan; Fatma A Al-Mulhim; Abdallah Y El-Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  E S Orwoll
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.741

View more
  15 in total

1.  Vitamin d deficiency- an ignored epidemic.

Authors:  Zahid Naeem
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2010-01

2.  Inflammatory and bone turnover markers in relation to PTH and vitamin D status among Saudi postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nasser M Al-Daghri; Sobhy Yakout; Eman Al-Shehri; Hanan Al-Fawaz; Naji Aljohani; Yousef Al-Saleh
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Inflammatory and bone turnover markers in relation to PTH and vitamin D status among saudi postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nasser M Al-Daghri; Sobhy Yakout; Eman Al-Shehri; Hanan A Al-Fawaz; Naji Aljohani; Yousef Al-Saleh
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

4.  Are we missing osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures in men?

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Abid Hussain Gullenpet; Haifa A Al-Turki; Tamar W Abdulrahman; Abdulmohsen H Al-Elq; Mohammed Quamar Azzam; Hadia Al-Shammary; Abdallah S Al-Omran; Abdallah A Al-Othman
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-05-02

5.  Established Osteoporosis and Gaps in the Management: Review from a Teaching hospital.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; As Al-Omran; Wi Al-Bakr; Md Quamar Azam; Am Tantawy; Aa Al-Othman
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-03

6.  The impact of adding weight-bearing exercise versus nonweight bearing programs to the medical treatment of elderly patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Alsayed A Shanb; Enas F Youssef
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2014-09

7.  Osteoporosis prophylaxis in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid therapy.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Abdulmohsen H Alelq; Badar A Alshafei; Haifa A Al-Turki; Mohammed A Abujubara
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Vitamin D levels in healthy men in eastern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Abdulmohsen AlElq; Haifa Al-Turki; Fatma Al-Mulhim; Amein Al-Ali
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Evaluation and identification of damaged single nucleotide polymorphisms in COL1A1 gene involved in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tariq Ahmad Masoodi; Mohammed A Alsaif; Sulaiman A Al Shammari; Adel A Alhamdan
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on serum vitamin d and bone mineral density in hypercholesterolemic patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abrar Thabit; Abdullah Alhifany; Razan Alsheikh; Sameh Namnqani; Ameen Al-Mohammadi; Soha Elmorsy; Mohammed Qari; Mohammed Ardawi
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2014-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.