Literature DB >> 17142690

DNA photorepair in echinoid embryos: effects of temperature on repair rate in Antarctic and non-Antarctic species.

Miles D Lamare1, Mike F Barker, Michael P Lesser, Craig Marshall.   

Abstract

To determine if an Antarctic species repairs DNA at rates equivalent to warmer water equivalents, we examined repair of UV-damaged DNA in echinoid embryos and larvae. DNA repair by photoreactivation was compared in three species Sterechinus neumayeri (Antarctica), Evechinus chloroticus (New Zealand) and Diadema setosum (Tropical Australia) spanning a latitudinal gradient from polar (77.86 degrees S) to tropical (19.25 degrees S) environments. We compared rates of photoreactivation as a function of ambient and experimental temperature in all three species, and rates of photoreactivation as a function of embryonic developmental stage in Sterechinus. DNA damage was quantified from cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) concentrations and rates of abnormal embryonic development. This study established that in the three species and in three developmental stages of Sterechinus, photoreactivation was the primary means of removing CPDs, was effective in repairing all CPDs in less than 24 h, and promoted significantly higher rates of normal development in UV-exposed embryos. CPD photorepair rate constant (k) in echinoid embryos ranged from 0.33 to 1.25 h(-1), equating to a time to 50% repair of between 0.6 and 2.1 h and time to 90%repair between 3.6 and 13.6 h. We observed that experimental temperature influenced photoreactivation rate. In Diadema plutei, the photoreactivation rate constant increased from k=0.58 h(-1) to 1.25 h(-1), with a Q(10)=2.15 between 22 degrees C and 32 degrees C. When compared among the three species across experimental temperatures (-1.9 to 32 degrees C), photoreactivation rates vary with a Q(10)=1.39. Photoreactivation rates were examined in three developmental stages of Sterechinus embryos, and while not significantly different, repair rates tended to be higher in the younger blastula and gastrula stages compared with later stage embryos. We concluded that photoreactivation is active in the Antarctic Sterechinus, but at a significantly slower (non-temperature compensated) rate. The low level of temperature compensation in photoreactivation may be one explanation for the relatively high sensitivity of Antarctic embryos to UV-R in comparison with non-Antarctic equivalents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142690     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Combined effects of UVR and temperature on the survival of crab larvae (Zoea I) from Patagonia: the role of uv-absorbing compounds.

Authors:  Rodrigo D Hernández Moresino; E Walter Helbling
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.118

2.  UVA-induced photo recovery during early zebrafish embryogenesis.

Authors:  Qiaoxiang Dong; W Todd Monroe; Terrence R Tiersch; Kurt R Svoboda
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.252

3.  Do high temperatures enhance the negative effects of ultraviolet-B radiation in embryonic and larval amphibians?

Authors:  Lesley A Alton; Craig E Franklin
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  Comparative DNA damage and repair in echinoderm coelomocytes exposed to genotoxicants.

Authors:  Ameena H El-Bibany; Andrea G Bodnar; Helena C Reinardy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Exploring the link between ultraviolet B radiation and immune function in amphibians: implications for emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Rebecca L Cramp; Craig E Franklin
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 6.  UV-Protective Compounds in Marine Organisms from the Southern Ocean.

Authors:  Laura Núñez-Pons; Conxita Avila; Giovanna Romano; Cinzia Verde; Daniela Giordano
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.