Literature DB >> 17142687

Voices of the dead: complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog.

Roderick A Suthers1, Peter M Narins, Wen-Yu Lin, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler, Annette Denzinger, Chun-He Xu, Albert S Feng.   

Abstract

Most anurans are highly vocal but their vocalizations are stereotyped and simple with limited repertoire sizes compared with other vocal vertebrates, presumably because of the limited mechanisms for fine vocal motor control. We recently reported that the call of the concaveeared torrent frog (Amolops tormotus Fei) is an exception in its seemingly endless variety, musical warbling quality, extension of call frequency into the ultrasonic range and the prominence of subharmonics, chaos and other nonlinear features. We now show that the major spectral features of its calls, responsible for this frog's vocal diversity, can be generated by forcing pressurized air through the larynx of euthanized males. Laryngeal specializations for ultrasound appear to include very thin portions of the medial vocal ligaments and reverse sexual size dimorphism of the larynx--being smaller in males than in females. The intricate morphology of the vocal cords, which changes along their length, suggests that nonlinear phenomena probably arise from complex nonlinear oscillatory regimes of separate elastically coupled masses. Amolops is thus the first amphibian for which the intrinsic nonlinear dynamics of its larynx--a relatively simple and expedient mechanism--can account for the species' call complexity, without invoking sophisticated neuromuscular control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142687     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  22 in total

1.  Smooth operator: avoidance of subharmonic bifurcations through mechanical mechanisms simplifies song motor control in adult zebra finches.

Authors:  Coen P H Elemans; Rodrigo Laje; Gabriel B Mindlin; Franz Goller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Subharmonic distortion in ear canal pressure and intracochlear pressure and motion.

Authors:  Stanley Huang; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-24

Review 3.  Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Nonlinear acoustic complexity in a fish 'two-voice' system.

Authors:  Aaron N Rice; Bruce R Land; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls.

Authors:  Simon W Townsend; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Novel vocal repertoire and paired swimbladders of the three-spined toadfish, Batrachomoeus trispinosus: insights into the diversity of the Batrachoididae.

Authors:  Aaron N Rice; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos vocalizations.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Tobias Riede; Roderick A Suthers
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Difference between the vocalizations of two sister species of pigeons explained in dynamical terms.

Authors:  R Gogui Alonso; Cecilia Kopuchian; Ana Amador; Maria de Los Angeles Suarez; Pablo L Tubaro; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Social vocalizations of big brown bats vary with behavioral context.

Authors:  Marie A Gadziola; Jasmine M S Grimsley; Paul A Faure; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin; Katarzyna Pisanski; Mathilde Massenet; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.