Literature DB >> 17142609

Mistake proofing: changing designs to reduce error.

J R Grout1.   

Abstract

Mistake proofing uses changes in the physical design of processes to reduce human error. It can be used to change designs in ways that prevent errors from occurring, to detect errors after they occur but before harm occurs, to allow processes to fail safely, or to alter the work environment to reduce the chance of errors. Effective mistake proofing design changes should initially be effective in reducing harm, be inexpensive, and easily implemented. Over time these design changes should make life easier and speed up the process. Ideally, the design changes should increase patients' and visitors' understanding of the process. These designs should themselves be mistake proofed and follow the good design practices of other disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142609      PMCID: PMC2464876          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  1 in total

1.  Preventing medical errors by designing benign failures.

Authors:  John R Grout
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-07
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Patient safety: Safer by design.

Authors:  Alison Tonks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-26

2.  Safety strategies in an academic radiation oncology department and recommendations for action.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terezakis; Peter Pronovost; Kendra Harris; Theodore Deweese; Eric Ford
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2011-07

3.  Beyond the corrective action hierarchy: A systems approach to organizational change.

Authors:  Laura J Wood; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Getting surgery right.

Authors:  John R Clarke; Janet Johnston; Edward D Finley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis.

Authors:  Eric C Ford; Ray Gaudette; Lee Myers; Bruce Vanderver; Lilly Engineer; Richard Zellars; Danny Y Song; John Wong; Theodore L Deweese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275.

Authors:  Eric Ford; Leigh Conroy; Lei Dong; Luis Fong de Los Santos; Anne Greener; Grace Gwe-Ya Kim; Jennifer Johnson; Perry Johnson; James G Mechalakos; Brian Napolitano; Stephanie Parker; Deborah Schofield; Koren Smith; Ellen Yorke; Michelle Wells
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Commentary: Continuing the E-value's post-publication peer review.

Authors:  Charles Poole
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 9.685

8.  A Structured Approach for Investigating the Causes of Medical Device Adverse Events.

Authors:  John N Amoore
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2014-11-27

9.  The "Resus:Station": the use of clinical simulations in a randomised crossover study to evaluate a novel resuscitation trolley.

Authors:  Susanna T Walker; Stephen J Brett; Anthony McKay; Rajesh Aggarwal; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  A patient safety education program in a medical physics residency.

Authors:  Eric C Ford; Matthew Nyflot; Matthew B Spraker; Gabrielle Kane; Kristi R G Hendrickson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.