Literature DB >> 17141799

Assessing the potential of immunohistochemistry for systematic gene expression profiling.

A Warford1, G Flack, J S Conquer, H Zola, J McCafferty.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a powerful technique for identifying sites of protein expression in tissues at the cellular and sub-cellular level. Here we have investigated the potential of using IHC for genome-wide expression screening by measuring the success rate and specificity of a panel of 35 monoclonal antibodies recognizing 5 well characterised CD antigens. Antibodies were pre-screened on acetone fixed frozen sections of spleen, tonsil and colon tissues. 19/35 antibodies gave staining with a success rate of 0/7 for JAM-2, 1/4 for CD99, 3/6 for CD138, 5/8 for CD45 and 10/10 for MHC-class II. 16/19 of these antibodies also gave staining on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections of tonsil and colon. All antibodies that had given staining were then profiled on tissues presented in human tissue microarrays. In the frozen microarrays 216 cores from 29 normal tissue types were present and in the formalin fixed paraffin array 344 cores from 35 normal and 4 cancers were represented. Where multiple antibodies were positive, there was evidence of consistent staining of the same tissues with several antibodies. In some cases differences in staining were observed potentially due to differential splice variants, polymorphisms or protein modification. With some antibodies there was evidence of cross-reactivity to inappropriate cells or structures. In addition the staining intensity with formalin fixation was changed quantitatively for some antibodies and in a few cases qualitatively, representing differential sensitivity of specific and non-specific epitopes to fixation. Accordingly, whilst IHC has potential for describing protein expression of unknown genes, these results emphasise a need to systematically address issues of specificity and sensitivity if appropriate profiles are to be described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17141799     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  4 in total

Review 1.  Antibody-based proteomics: fast-tracking molecular diagnostics in oncology.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Darran P O'Connor; Elton Rexhepaj; Fredrik Ponten; William M Gallagher
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Machine-based method for multiplex in situ molecular characterization of tissues by immunofluorescence detection.

Authors:  Dmitry Yarilin; Ke Xu; Mesruh Turkekul; Ning Fan; Yevgeniy Romin; Sho Fijisawa; Afsar Barlas; Katia Manova-Todorova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  High-resolution mapping of linear antibody epitopes using ultrahigh-density peptide microarrays.

Authors:  Søren Buus; Johan Rockberg; Björn Forsström; Peter Nilsson; Mathias Uhlen; Claus Schafer-Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Application of phage display to high throughput antibody generation and characterization.

Authors:  Darren J Schofield; Anthony R Pope; Veronica Clementel; Jenny Buckell; Susan Dj Chapple; Kay F Clarke; Jennie S Conquer; Anna M Crofts; Sandra R E Crowther; Michael R Dyson; Gillian Flack; Gareth J Griffin; Yvette Hooks; William J Howat; Anja Kolb-Kokocinski; Susan Kunze; Cecile D Martin; Gareth L Maslen; Joanne N Mitchell; Maureen O'Sullivan; Rajika L Perera; Wendy Roake; S Paul Shadbolt; Karen J Vincent; Anthony Warford; Wendy E Wilson; Jane Xie; Joyce L Young; John McCafferty
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.