OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between time from injury to rehabilitation admission and outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: One hundred-bed inpatient rehabilitation facility with a 20-bed brain injury unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TBIs discharged from initial inpatient rehabilitation between 2003 and 2004 (N=158). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes examined were functional independence at discharge (motor, cognitive, total FIM scores), rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), and rehabilitation cost. RESULTS: Significant linear trends were observed for time to admission and motor FIM scores, total FIM scores, rehabilitation LOS, and cost. All linear regression models contained time to admission as a significant predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. Over half of the variability in outcomes was explained by predictors including time to admission and case-mix group or individual FIM scores with the exception of discharge motor FIM score, for which only 45% of the variability was explained. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who progress to rehabilitation earlier do better functionally and have lower costs and shorter LOSs. Furthermore, the time to rehabilitation admission is easily calculated and could be used by rehabilitation providers in adjunct with admission FIM scores to estimate resource utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between time from injury to rehabilitation admission and outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: One hundred-bed inpatient rehabilitation facility with a 20-bed brain injury unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TBIs discharged from initial inpatient rehabilitation between 2003 and 2004 (N=158). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes examined were functional independence at discharge (motor, cognitive, total FIM scores), rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), and rehabilitation cost. RESULTS: Significant linear trends were observed for time to admission and motor FIM scores, total FIM scores, rehabilitation LOS, and cost. All linear regression models contained time to admission as a significant predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. Over half of the variability in outcomes was explained by predictors including time to admission and case-mix group or individual FIM scores with the exception of discharge motor FIM score, for which only 45% of the variability was explained. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who progress to rehabilitation earlier do better functionally and have lower costs and shorter LOSs. Furthermore, the time to rehabilitation admission is easily calculated and could be used by rehabilitation providers in adjunct with admission FIM scores to estimate resource utilization.
Authors: Susan D Horn; John D Corrigan; Cynthia L Beaulieu; Jennifer Bogner; Ryan S Barrett; Clare G Giuffrida; David K Ryser; Kelli Cooper; Deborah M Carroll; Daniel Deutscher Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.966