OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and intermittent noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home-based RMT, with assessment in a primary care pulmonary center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with restrictive thoracic disorders; 28 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTION: Three months of RMT by isocapnic hyperpnea or sham training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory muscle strength and endurance, lung function, exercise performance, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: After RMT, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure was increased (27.6%+/-36.5%, P=.013). In patients who could perform cycle ergometer testing (n=17), peak oxygen consumption (2.24+/-3.39mLxkg(-1).min(-1) vs -1.71+/-2.54mLxkg(-1).min(-1), P=.014) and maximal work rate (9.4+/-14.8W vs -5.1+/-10.8W, P=.043) increased relative to a control group. Similar differences occurred regarding changes of HRQOL (physical performance, 3.3+/-11.4 score vs -6.6+/-9.0 score; P=.012) and time of ventilator use (-0.6+/-1.2h/d vs 0.4+/-0.5h/d, P=.010). Lung volumes, 12-second maximum voluntary ventilation, 6-minute walking distance, and blood gases were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and NPPV, RMT improved inspiratory muscle strength. Exercise performance and HRQOL were improved when the 2 groups were compared. RMT was practicable and safe despite severe respiratory impairment. Further evaluation, including different training intensities and modalities, seems warranted.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and intermittent noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home-based RMT, with assessment in a primary care pulmonary center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with restrictive thoracic disorders; 28 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTION: Three months of RMT by isocapnic hyperpnea or sham training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory muscle strength and endurance, lung function, exercise performance, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: After RMT, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure was increased (27.6%+/-36.5%, P=.013). In patients who could perform cycle ergometer testing (n=17), peak oxygen consumption (2.24+/-3.39mLxkg(-1).min(-1) vs -1.71+/-2.54mLxkg(-1).min(-1), P=.014) and maximal work rate (9.4+/-14.8W vs -5.1+/-10.8W, P=.043) increased relative to a control group. Similar differences occurred regarding changes of HRQOL (physical performance, 3.3+/-11.4 score vs -6.6+/-9.0 score; P=.012) and time of ventilator use (-0.6+/-1.2h/d vs 0.4+/-0.5h/d, P=.010). Lung volumes, 12-second maximum voluntary ventilation, 6-minute walking distance, and blood gases were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and NPPV, RMT improved inspiratory muscle strength. Exercise performance and HRQOL were improved when the 2 groups were compared. RMT was practicable and safe despite severe respiratory impairment. Further evaluation, including different training intensities and modalities, seems warranted.
Authors: Daniela G L Terson de Paleville; William B McKay; Rodney J Folz; Alexander V Ovechkin Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Rafael Michel de Macedo; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Costantino Ortiz Costantini; Dayane Casali; Andrea Pires Muller; Costantino Roberto Costantini; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; Luiz César Guarita-Souza Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2011-07-26
Authors: G B Migliori; F M Marx; N Ambrosino; E Zampogna; H S Schaaf; M M van der Zalm; B Allwood; A L Byrne; K Mortimer; R S Wallis; G J Fox; C C Leung; J M Chakaya; B Seaworth; A Rachow; B J Marais; J Furin; O W Akkerman; F Al Yaquobi; A F S Amaral; S Borisov; J A Caminero; A C C Carvalho; D Chesov; L R Codecasa; R C Teixeira; M P Dalcolmo; S Datta; A-T Dinh-Xuan; R Duarte; C A Evans; J-M García-García; G Günther; G Hoddinott; S Huddart; O Ivanova; R Laniado-Laborín; S Manga; K Manika; A Mariandyshev; F C Q Mello; S G Mpagama; M Muñoz-Torrico; P Nahid; C W M Ong; D J Palmero; A Piubello; E Pontali; D R Silva; R Singla; A Spanevello; S Tiberi; Z F Udwadia; M Vitacca; R Centis; L D Ambrosio; G Sotgiu; C Lange; D Visca Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.427
Authors: Emanuele Pontali; Denise Rossato Silva; Florian M Marx; Jose Antonio Caminero; Rosella Centis; Lia D'Ambrosio; Jose Maria Garcia-Garcia; Jeremiah Chakaya Muhwa; Simon Tiberi; Giovanni Battista Migliori Journal: Arch Bronconeumol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.333
Authors: Sara J Abdallah; David S Chan; Robin Glicksman; Cassandra T Mendonca; Yuanming Luo; Jean Bourbeau; Benjamin M Smith; Dennis Jensen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Luisa Cacciante; Andrea Turolla; Giorgia Pregnolato; Sara Federico; Francesca Baldan; Anna Rutkowska; Sebastian Rutkowski Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-04-23 Impact factor: 3.440