Literature DB >> 17141146

Interrater reliability of 3 simplified neurologic scales applied to adults presenting to the emergency department with altered levels of consciousness.

Michelle Gill1, Kevin Martens, Elizabeth L Lynch, Ahmad Salih, Steven M Green.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The Simplified Motor Score was recently found to exhibit equal test performance to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) when predicting 4 clinically important trauma outcomes. The present study tests the interrater reliability of the Simplified Motor Scale, the GCS and its components, and 2 other simplified neurologic scales when applied to patients presenting to the emergency department with altered levels of consciousness from any cause.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, emergency physicians independently assigned the GCS, Simplified Motor Scale, and 2 4-point scales--AVPU (Alert, responds to Verbal stimuli, responds to Painful stimuli, Unresponsive) and ACDU (Alert, Confused, Drowsy, Unresponsive)--to qualifying adult subjects. Two physicians filled out prospective data forms within 5 minutes of each other while remaining blinded to each other's assessments. Data were pooled and analyzed for interrater reliability of all scales using simple agreement, unweighted kappa, Spearman's rho, and Kendall's tau-b.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six subjects were enrolled, with 6 later excluded. Percentage agreements were 83% for the Simplified Motor Scale, 58% for the ACDU scale, 57% for the AVPU scale, and 42% for the Total GCS. The kappa values were 0.70 for the Simplified Motor Scale, 0.43 for ACDU, 0.41 for AVPU, and 0.32 for the Total GCS. The Simplified Motor Scale also had the highest Spearman's rho (.85) and second highest Kendall's tau-b (0.81).
CONCLUSION: The Simplified Motor Scale has the best interrater reliability for the assessment of altered level of consciousness of traumatic and nontraumatic cause among the scales tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17141146     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  25 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.

Authors:  Joshua Kornbluth; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reliability of Robotic Telemedicine for Assessing Critically Ill Patients with the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score and Glasgow Coma Scale.

Authors:  Amelia K Adcock; Heidi Kosiorek; Prachi Parikh; Alyssa Chauncey; Qing Wu; Bart M Demaerschalk
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  The FOUR score and GCS as predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Molly McNett; Shelly Amato; Anastasia Gianakis; Dawn Grimm; Sue Ann Philippbar; Josie Belle; Cristina Moran
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Comparison of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring between nurses and residents.

Authors:  Nur Baykara; Kaan Gökduman; Tülay Hoşten; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center.

Authors:  Erin B Wasserman; Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Jeremy T Cushman; Jeffrey M Caterino; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Suzanne M Gillespie; Julius D Cheng; Ann Dozier
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Validation of the Italian version of a new coma scale: the FOUR score.

Authors:  Eleonora Marcati; Silvia Ricci; Alfonsina Casalena; Danilo Toni; Antonio Carolei; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michael Fischer; Stephan Rüegg; Adam Czaplinski; Monika Strohmeier; Angelika Lehmann; Franziska Tschan; Patrick R Hunziker; Stephan C Marsch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  College student drinking and ambulance utilization.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Andrew J McClurg; Jamie R Bolles; Suzanne J Hubbell; Heather A Will; Michael P Carey
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

10.  Randomized controlled trial of a scoring aid to improve Glasgow Coma Scale scoring by emergency medical services providers.

Authors:  Amanda Feldman; Kimberly W Hart; Christopher J Lindsell; Jason T McMullan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.