Literature DB >> 17140893

Clinical analysis of gastroesophageal reflux after PEG.

Shinji Nishiwaki1, Hiroshi Araki, Naoe Goto, Yukari Niwa, Masaya Kubota, Masahide Iwashita, Nobuhito Onogi, Hiroo Hatakeyama, Takao Hayashi, Teruo Maeda, Koushirou Saitoh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to predict whether or not gastroesophageal reflux (GER), such as aspiration or vomiting, will occur after PEG.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that would support the prediction of aspiration after PEG.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Patients who underwent PEG from February 1998 to June 2005 in our hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 178 patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic observation was carried out during PEG tube placement and at PEG tube replacement to determine the presence of hiatus hernia and/or reflux esophagitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Gastric emptying and GER index (GERI) were measured by using a radioisotope technique.
RESULTS: The patients were divided into 2 groups: the non-GER (NGER) group (n = 108), who had no symptoms of GER, and the GER group (n = 70), who showed these symptoms. No significant differences were observed between the groups in age, sex, morbidity, the presence of reflux esophagitis at PEG tube placement, gastric emptying, or serum albumin levels. The presence of a hiatus hernia (P = .028) and reflux esophagitis grading Los Angeles classification C or D (P = .008) were significantly more frequent in the GER group compared with the NGER group. The GERI was also significantly higher in the GER group than in the NGER group (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of hiatus hernia, severe reflux esophagitis, and a high GERI might be predictive factors of aspiration or vomiting after PEG tube placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140893     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

1.  Interventions for Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Beatrice Manduchi; Gina Marni Fainman; Margaret Walshe
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Small intestinal intussusceptions due to the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube.

Authors:  Takayuki Satoh; Kazue Sawada; Miyuki Satoh; Kikuchi Yohko; Masataka Yamada; Masaaki Zaitsu; Tadahiro Osada; Reiji Sawaya; Toshie Nata; Nobuhiro Ueno; Kentaro Moriichi; Katsuya Ikuta; Yusuke Mizukami; Jiro Watari; Mikihiro Fujiya; Yutaka Kohgo
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-03-03

3.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Prevents Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Nasogastric Tube Feeding: A Prospective Study with 24-Hour pH Monitoring.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Seok Ho Dong; Jae Yeon Lee; Nam-Hoon Kim; Jae Young Jang; Hyo Jong Kim; Byung-Ho Kim; Young Woon Chang; Rin Chang
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.519

4.  Semi-solid feeds may reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonia and shorten postoperative length of stay after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

Authors:  Ezekiel Wong Toh Yoon; Kaori Yoneda; Kazuki Nishihara
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  Use of a Low-carbohydrate Enteral Nutrition Formula with Effective Inhibition of Hypoglycemia and Post-infusion Hyperglycemia in Non-diabetic Patients Fed via a Jejunostomy Tube.

Authors:  Shinji Nishiwaki; Hiroko Fujimoto; Takuya Kurobe; Atsushi Baba; Masahide Iwashita; Hiroo Hatakeyama; Takao Hayashi; Teruo Maeda
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 1.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.