Literature DB >> 17140526

Pain perception in children during caries removal with the Vector system: a pilot study.

M Chomyszyn-Gajewska1, H Kwapinska, J Zarzecka.   

Abstract

AIM: A pilot study to compare pain perception during caries treatment in children by means of: the Vector system versus a mechanical method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A population of 31 children, aged 7-11 years, with a positive attitude towards dental treatment was recruited. Every child had two permanent molar teeth treated, one using the Vector system (piezo-driven ultrasonic device) and the other using conventional method (dental bur). Corah, Hochman and the visual scale (Facial Expression Scale) were applied to evaluate anxiety and pain perception.
RESULTS: Treatment with the Vector system required significantly longer time 31.1 versus 4.7 mins for the conventional method. With the Vector system 54.8% of children and with conventional method 29.0% felt no pain. Girls admitted to feeling more pain than boys (verbal scale p < 0.018, visual scale p < 0.072). A high statistical correlation between verbal and visual scales was confirmed (r = 0.821; p < 0.001 and a greater level of pain was found using conventional method.
CONCLUSIONS: The Vector system is useful in treating caries in children, because it minimizes the negative attitudes to pain but takes significantly longer to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140526     DOI: 10.1007/bf03320813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  16 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation.

Authors:  A Banerjee; E A Kidd; T F Watson
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Removal effects of the Nd:YAG laser and Carisolv on carious dentin.

Authors:  Y Yamada; M Hossain; T Kawanaka; J Kinoshita; K Matsumoto
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  2000-10

3.  Primary preparation of class II cavities with oscillating systems.

Authors:  Michael J Wicht; Rainer Haak; Ulrike B Fritz; Michael J Noack
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods.

Authors:  P Nadanovsky; F Cohen Carneiro; F Souza de Mello
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Selective caries removal with air abrasion.

Authors:  S Horiguchi; T Yamada; S Inokoshi; J Tagami
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  Preparation and restoration of small interproximal carious lesions with sonic instruments.

Authors:  B Hugo; A Stassinakis
Journal:  Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent       Date:  1998-04

7.  Comparison of pain associated with mechanical and chemomechanical removal of caries.

Authors:  K J Anusavice; J E Kincheloe
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  In vitro study of caries detection through sound dentin using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent.

Authors:  Yukiteru Iwami; Ayako Shimizu; Hiroko Yamamoto; Mikako Hayashi; Fumio Takeshige; Shigeyuki Ebisu
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  The Fear of Dental Pain questionnaire: construction and validity.

Authors:  Arjen J van Wijk; Johan Hoogstraten
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study.

Authors:  Patricia A McGrath; Cheryl E Seifert; Kathy N Speechley; John C Booth; Larry Stitt; Margaret C Gibson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  5 in total

1.  The evaluation of the vector system in removal of carious tissue.

Authors:  Mine Yildirim; Figen Seymen; Nurullah Keklikoglu
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-04-29

2.  Effect of minimally invasive restorations on microorganism count in the oral cavity of a patient with early childhood caries.

Authors:  S P Mota; D N Soares; L C Maia; A G Antonio
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-05

3.  Sonic and ultrasonic oscillating devices for the management of pain and dental fear in children or adolescents that require caries removal: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Cianetti; Iosief Abraha; Stefano Pagano; Eleonora Lupatelli; Guido Lombardo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Tanya Walsh; Thomas Lamont; Waraf Al-Yaseen; Lars Bjørndal; Janet E Clarkson; Margherita Fontana; Jesus Gomez Rossi; Gerd Göstemeyer; Colin Levey; Anne Müller; David Ricketts; Mark Robertson; Ruth M Santamaria; Nicola Pt Innes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-19

Review 5.  Evidence provided for the use of oscillating instruments in restorative dentistry: A systematic review.

Authors:  Panagiotis Ntovas; Spyridon Doukoudakis; John Tzoutzas; Panagiotis Lagouvardos
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.