Literature DB >> 17140502

The use of the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment (ALPHA) tool in the detection of psychosocial risk factors for postpartum depression: a randomized controlled trial.

Emma Robertson Blackmore1, June Carroll2, Anthony Reid2, Anne Biringer2, Richard H Glazier2, Deana Midmer2, Joanne A Permaul3, Donna E Stewart4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Eliciting known risk factors for postpartum depression (PPD) during pregnancy may enable primary health care providers to identify women at increased risk of becoming depressed. The purpose of this study was to examine how well the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment (ALPHA) form identified antenatal risk factors for PPD, compared with routine care, in a sample of pregnant women.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the ALPHA form in detecting antenatal risk factors associated with the adverse postpartum outcomes of postpartum depression, intimate partner violence, child abuse, and couple dysfunction. The participants were primary antenatal care providers--family physicians, obstetricians, and midwives--from four diverse communities in Ontario. These providers were matched and then randomly allocated into the intervention group, who used the ALPHA form, or into the control group, who administered usual care. In total, 227 pregnant women were recruited: 98 in the ALPHA group and 129 in the control group. The data presented in this paper are from a secondary analysis focusing on PPD as the outcome.
RESULTS: Providers randomized to the ALPHA group identified a statistically significantly higher proportion of women with antenatal psychosocial risk factors for PPD (36% vs. 26%) and a significantly higher number of risk factors per woman compared with the control group (mean 2.1 vs.1.8) (z = -1.96, P = 0.05). Providers in the ALPHA group also identified significantly more women having a "previous history of depression" (16% vs. 6%) (chi2 = 5.243, df = 1, P = 0.03) and "[having] witnessed or experienced abuse as a child" (17% vs. 3%) (chi2 = 12.488, df = 1, P = 0.0005), which are both established risk factors for PPD.
CONCLUSION: The ALPHA provides a systematic means of eliciting antenatal psychosocial risk factors for PPD for primary care providers, and it may be particularly useful for raising and discussing sensitive issues. The detection of depressive symptomatology during pregnancy remains problematic, however, and detection may be improved by administering a simple standardized measure of depressive symptomatology during routine antenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140502     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32268-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  17 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Louise M Howard; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Beyond Screening: A Stepped Care Pathway for Managing Postpartum Depression in Pediatric Settings.

Authors:  Su-Chin Serene Olin; Mary McCord; Ruth E K Stein; Bonnie D Kerker; Dara Weiss; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Use of the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire to Assess Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated with Risk for Postpartum Depression: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sharon L Ruyak; Fares Qeadan
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 4.  Menstrual cycle-related exacerbation of disease.

Authors:  Joann V Pinkerton; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Identification of postpartum depression.

Authors:  Dorothy K Y Sit; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  The relationship between women's attachment style and perinatal mood disturbance: implications for screening and treatment.

Authors:  Catherine Monk; Kristin L Leight; Yixin Fang
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Disparities in self-reported postpartum depression among Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Women in Hawaii: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2007.

Authors:  Donald K Hayes; Van M Ta; Eric L Hurwitz; Kristen M Mitchell-Box; Loretta J Fuddy
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-08-04

Review 8.  Antenatal psychosocial assessment for reducing perinatal mental health morbidity.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Austin; Susan R Priest; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 9.  Measuring perinatal mental health risk.

Authors:  M Johnson; V Schmeid; S J Lupton; M-P Austin; S M Matthey; L Kemp; T Meade; A E Yeo
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Measuring the risk factors for postpartum depression: development of the Japanese version of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R-J).

Authors:  Mari Ikeda; Kiyoko Kamibeppu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.