Literature DB >> 17139634

Quantifying angiogenesis in VEGF-enhanced tissue-engineered bladder constructs by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using contrast agents of different molecular weights.

Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng1, Chad Wallis, Zhiping Shou, Walid A Farhat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare Gadomer, a macromolecular magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent, and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for quantifying angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder constructs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Constructs enhanced with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were grafted onto the bladder of 12 rabbits (N= 3/VEGF, VEGF = 0,10,15,20 ng/g tissue). After eight days dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in each animal using Gadomer and Gd-DTPA, separated by a one-hour interval. DCE-MRI parameters were calculated from two-compartment pharmacokinetics (plasma volume fraction, v(p); transfer constant, K(trans)) and model-free analysis, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Histology assessment of microvessel density (MVD) and Evans blue permeability were compared to DCE-MRI.
RESULTS: MVD was elevated (P < 0.05) at the highest VEGF but not among lower levels; permeability differences were absent. Contrast enhancement increased with VEGF and was better resolved with Gadomer than Gd-DTPA. Gadomer was the better assay for estimating plasma volume: v(p) provided the best distinction (P < 0.005), but both v(p) and AUC were correlated to MVD. With Gd-DTPA, only AUC distinguished MVD differences (P< 0.05). Changes in K(trans) were insignificant.
CONCLUSION: Macromolecular contrast agents are valuable for monitoring angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder grafts. Compared to Gd-DTPA, Gadomer provides more accurate and precise quantification of microvessel function, and is better suited to pharmacokinetic analysis for accurate physiological quantification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17139634     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  12 in total

1.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Xinzeng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Tumor microvasculature observed using different contrast agents: a comparison between Gd-DTPA-Albumin and B-22956/1 in an experimental model of mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  Federico Boschi; Pasquina Marzola; Marco Sandri; Elena Nicolato; Mirco Galiè; Silvia Fiorini; Flavia Merigo; Vito Lorusso; Linda Chaabane; Andrea Sbarbati
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Multivalent protein polymer MRI contrast agents: controlling relaxivity via modulation of amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Lindsay S Karfeld-Sulzer; Emily A Waters; Nicolynn E Davis; Thomas J Meade; Annelise E Barron
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Protein polymer MRI contrast agents: Longitudinal analysis of biomaterials in vivo.

Authors:  Lindsay S Karfeld-Sulzer; Emily A Waters; Ellen K Kohlmeir; Hermann Kissler; Xiaomin Zhang; Dixon B Kaufman; Annelise E Barron; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Simultaneous imaging of tumor oxygenation and microvascular permeability using Overhauser enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Shingo Matsumoto; Hironobu Yasui; Sonny Batra; Yuichi Kinoshita; Marcelino Bernardo; Jeeva P Munasinghe; Hideo Utsumi; Rajani Choudhuri; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Sankaran Subramanian; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of type I collagen scaffold in rat: improving visualization of bladder and subcutaneous implants.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Paul Geutjes; Egbert Oosterwijk; Arend Heerschap
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  In vivo monitoring of sorafenib therapy effects on experimental prostate carcinomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and macromolecular contrast media.

Authors:  Clemens C Cyran; Bettina Schwarz; Philipp M Paprottka; Steven Sourbron; Jobst C von Einem; Olaf Dietrich; Rabea Hinkel; Dirk A Clevert; Christiane J Bruns; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The potential utility of non-invasive imaging to monitor restoration of bladder structure and function following subtotal cystectomy (STC).

Authors:  David Burmeister; Bimjhana Bishwokarma; Tamer AbouShwareb; John Olson; Maja Herco; Josh Tan; Karl-Erik Andersson; George Christ
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Changes in vascular permeability and expression of different angiogenic factors following anti-angiogenic treatment in rat glioma.

Authors:  Meser M Ali; Branislava Janic; Abbas Babajani-Feremi; Nadimpalli R S Varma; A S M Iskander; John Anagli; Ali S Arbab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Practical dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in small animal models of cancer: data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Jennifer G Whisenant; Mary E Loveless; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.