PURPOSE: To compare Gadomer, a macromolecular magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent, and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for quantifying angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder constructs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Constructs enhanced with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were grafted onto the bladder of 12 rabbits (N= 3/VEGF, VEGF = 0,10,15,20 ng/g tissue). After eight days dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in each animal using Gadomer and Gd-DTPA, separated by a one-hour interval. DCE-MRI parameters were calculated from two-compartment pharmacokinetics (plasma volume fraction, v(p); transfer constant, K(trans)) and model-free analysis, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Histology assessment of microvessel density (MVD) and Evans blue permeability were compared to DCE-MRI. RESULTS: MVD was elevated (P < 0.05) at the highest VEGF but not among lower levels; permeability differences were absent. Contrast enhancement increased with VEGF and was better resolved with Gadomer than Gd-DTPA. Gadomer was the better assay for estimating plasma volume: v(p) provided the best distinction (P < 0.005), but both v(p) and AUC were correlated to MVD. With Gd-DTPA, only AUC distinguished MVD differences (P< 0.05). Changes in K(trans) were insignificant. CONCLUSION: Macromolecular contrast agents are valuable for monitoring angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder grafts. Compared to Gd-DTPA, Gadomer provides more accurate and precise quantification of microvessel function, and is better suited to pharmacokinetic analysis for accurate physiological quantification.
PURPOSE: To compare Gadomer, a macromolecular magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent, and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for quantifying angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder constructs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Constructs enhanced with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were grafted onto the bladder of 12 rabbits (N= 3/VEGF, VEGF = 0,10,15,20 ng/g tissue). After eight days dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in each animal using Gadomer and Gd-DTPA, separated by a one-hour interval. DCE-MRI parameters were calculated from two-compartment pharmacokinetics (plasma volume fraction, v(p); transfer constant, K(trans)) and model-free analysis, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Histology assessment of microvessel density (MVD) and Evans blue permeability were compared to DCE-MRI. RESULTS: MVD was elevated (P < 0.05) at the highest VEGF but not among lower levels; permeability differences were absent. Contrast enhancement increased with VEGF and was better resolved with Gadomer than Gd-DTPA. Gadomer was the better assay for estimating plasma volume: v(p) provided the best distinction (P < 0.005), but both v(p) and AUC were correlated to MVD. With Gd-DTPA, only AUC distinguished MVD differences (P< 0.05). Changes in K(trans) were insignificant. CONCLUSION: Macromolecular contrast agents are valuable for monitoring angiogenesis in tissue-engineered bladder grafts. Compared to Gd-DTPA, Gadomer provides more accurate and precise quantification of microvessel function, and is better suited to pharmacokinetic analysis for accurate physiological quantification.
Authors: Lindsay S Karfeld-Sulzer; Emily A Waters; Nicolynn E Davis; Thomas J Meade; Annelise E Barron Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Lindsay S Karfeld-Sulzer; Emily A Waters; Ellen K Kohlmeir; Hermann Kissler; Xiaomin Zhang; Dixon B Kaufman; Annelise E Barron; Thomas J Meade Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Clemens C Cyran; Bettina Schwarz; Philipp M Paprottka; Steven Sourbron; Jobst C von Einem; Olaf Dietrich; Rabea Hinkel; Dirk A Clevert; Christiane J Bruns; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Meser M Ali; Branislava Janic; Abbas Babajani-Feremi; Nadimpalli R S Varma; A S M Iskander; John Anagli; Ali S Arbab Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240