Literature DB >> 17139062

"They would say that, wouldn't they?" A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research.

Hilda Bastian1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17139062      PMCID： PMC1676333          DOI： 10.1177/014107680609901207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN： 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Are randomised controlled trials in the BMJ different?

Authors:  M Egger; C Bartlett; P Jüni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

2.  Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Peter A L Bonis; Harry Moskowitz; Christopher H Schmid; John P A Ioannidis; Chenchen Wang; Joseph Lau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Lisa A Bero; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Otavio Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

4.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Mette T Haahr; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.

Authors:  Susan S Buchkowsky; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Medical reviews face criticism over lapses.

Authors:  David Armstrong
Journal:  Wall St J (East Ed)       Date:  2006-07-19

8.  Update on JAMA's conflict of interest policy.

Authors:  Annette Flanagin; Phil B Fontanarosa; Catherine D DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Anders W Jørgensen; Jørgen Hilden; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-06

10.  Potential research participants' views regarding researcher and institutional financial conflicts of interest.

Authors:  S Y H Kim; R W Millard; P Nisbet; C Cox; E D Caine
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical studies in medical journals.

Authors:  J P Griffin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Veronika W Skrivankova; Rebecca C Richmond; Benjamin A R Woolf; Neil M Davies; Sonja A Swanson; Tyler J VanderWeele; Nicholas J Timpson; Julian P T Higgins; Niki Dimou; Claudia Langenberg; Elizabeth W Loder; Robert M Golub; Matthias Egger; George Davey Smith; J Brent Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of the Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Utility of Developmental Trauma Disorder (DTD) Symptom Criteria.

Authors:  Nicholas M Morelli; Miguel T Villodas
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Can authorship bias be detected in meta-analysis?

Authors:  Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Rasheda Rabbani; Lisa M Lix; Alexis F Turgeon; Brett L Houston; Dean A Fergusson; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Nondisclosure of Financial Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: An Intractable Problem?

Authors:  Hilda Bastian
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.069
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.