Sophia Ehrström1, Anna Yu, Eva Rylander. 1. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. sophia.ehrstrom@ds.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the change of glucose in vaginal secretions during glucose tolerance testing in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and in healthy control subjects. METHODS: Thirty-eight women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and 45 healthy, age-matched controls completed a health questionnaire regarding general and gynecologic health and food and alcohol habits. They all underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and a vaginal examination. Vaginal secretion was collected from the proximal part of the vagina. Glucose in plasma and in vaginal secretions were measured at fasting and after 2 hours and analyzed with the hexokinase method. A sample size analysis showed that the number of subjects included in the study was sufficient for a beta value of 0.80, at the significance level of alpha=.05, at a difference in glucose in vaginal secretions of 30% after oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: In healthy women, the median level of glucose in vaginal secretions was 5.2 mM before and 3.7 mM after oral glucose tolerance test, and plasma glucose was 5.0 mM before and 5.8 mM after oral glucose tolerance test. No significant difference was seen regarding change of glucose level in vaginal secretions and plasma glucose after testing, compared with before oral glucose tolerance testing. CONCLUSION: There were no differences between women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and control subjects regarding change in glucose level in vaginal secretions or in plasma during oral glucose tolerance test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the change of glucose in vaginal secretions during glucose tolerance testing in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and in healthy control subjects. METHODS: Thirty-eight women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and 45 healthy, age-matched controls completed a health questionnaire regarding general and gynecologic health and food and alcohol habits. They all underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and a vaginal examination. Vaginal secretion was collected from the proximal part of the vagina. Glucose in plasma and in vaginal secretions were measured at fasting and after 2 hours and analyzed with the hexokinase method. A sample size analysis showed that the number of subjects included in the study was sufficient for a beta value of 0.80, at the significance level of alpha=.05, at a difference in glucose in vaginal secretions of 30% after oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: In healthy women, the median level of glucose in vaginal secretions was 5.2 mM before and 3.7 mM after oral glucose tolerance test, and plasma glucose was 5.0 mM before and 5.8 mM after oral glucose tolerance test. No significant difference was seen regarding change of glucose level in vaginal secretions and plasma glucose after testing, compared with before oral glucose tolerance testing. CONCLUSION: There were no differences between women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and control subjects regarding change in glucose level in vaginal secretions or in plasma during oral glucose tolerance test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Authors: Irene A Burger; David A Scheiner; David W Crook; Valerie Treyer; Thomas F Hany; Gustav K von Schulthess Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jesús F T Miranda-Ozuna; Mar S Hernández-García; Luis G Brieba; Claudia G Benítez-Cardoza; Jaime Ortega-López; Arturo González-Robles; Rossana Arroyo Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Karine Dufresne; Vladyslav A Podskalniy; Christine A Herfst; Gabrielle F M Lovell; Isaac S Lee; Erica N DeJong; John K McCormick; Stephen W Tuffs Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.476
Authors: Silke Baldewijns; Mart Sillen; Ilse Palmans; Paul Vandecruys; Patrick Van Dijck; Liesbeth Demuyser Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Máté Manczinger; Alexandra Bocsik; Gabriella F Kocsis; Andrea Vörös; Zoltán Hegedűs; Lilla Ördögh; Éva Kondorosi; Annamária Marton; Csaba Vízler; Vilmos Tubak; Mária Deli; Lajos Kemény; István Nagy; Lóránt Lakatos Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Tzu Shan Ng; Shu Yih Chew; Premmala Rangasamy; Mohd N Mohd Desa; Doblin Sandai; Pei Pei Chong; Leslie Thian Lung Than Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Shereen A Sayed; Ehsan A B Hassan; Muhamad R Abdel Hameed; Michael N Agban; Mostafa F Mohammed Saleh; Hayam H Mohammed; Abu-Baker M Abdel-Aal; Sherein G Elgendy Journal: J Blood Med Date: 2021-06-15