George Sgouros1, Hong Song, Paul W Ladenson, Richard L Wahl. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. gsgouros@jhmi.edu
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Based on an extensive dataset analyzed by Benua et al., a whole-body retention threshold of 2.96 GBq (80 mCi) at 48 h has been used to limit the radioactivity of (131)I administered to thyroid cancer patients with diffuse pulmonary metastases. In this work, the 80-mCi activity retention limit is used to derive lung-absorbed doses and dose rates. The resulting dose-rate-based limits make it possible to account for patient-specific differences in lung geometry. This is particularly important, for example, in pediatric patients exhibiting diffuse lung metastases. The approach also highlights the impact of altered radioiodine kinetics as seen with recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone. METHODS: The dose-rate constraint (DRC) was defined as the absorbed dose rate to the lungs of the adult female reference phantom when 80 mCi of (131)I are in the body and 90% of this is uniformly distributed in the lungs. With this definition, the 80-mCi rule was generalized by calculating the activity required to yield a dose rate equal to DRC using lung-to-lung S factor values corresponding to different reference phantoms. RESULTS: A DRC value of 43.6 cGy/h was obtained. Applying this DRC to the adult male phantom and to the phantom of a 15-y-old yields equivalent 48-h activity limits of 3.72 GBq (101 mCi) and 2.45 GBq (66.2 mCi), respectively. Depending on model parameters, the absorbed doses to lungs ranged from 57 to 112 Gy; the photon-only portion, which better reflects the dose to normal lung parenchyma, ranged from 4.9 to 55 Gy. CONCLUSION: A dose-rate-based version of the 80-mCi rule is derived and used to demonstrate application of this rule to pediatric patients and to adult male patients. The implications of the 80-mCi rule are also examined. The assumption of uniform energy deposition in the lungs leads to substantially overestimated absorbed doses. Severe radiation-induced lung toxicity, expected at normal lung absorbed doses of 25-27 Gy, is avoided, probably because most of the local electron dose is delivered to tumor tissue instead of to normal lung parenchyma. The possibility of using a DRC to adjust treatment for different clinical situations is illustrated. The analysis suggests that a dosimetry-based approach will be particularly important in the treatment of patients with lung metastases when a recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone protocol is used.
UNLABELLED: Based on an extensive dataset analyzed by Benua et al., a whole-body retention threshold of 2.96 GBq (80 mCi) at 48 h has been used to limit the radioactivity of (131)I administered to thyroid cancerpatients with diffuse pulmonary metastases. In this work, the 80-mCi activity retention limit is used to derive lung-absorbed doses and dose rates. The resulting dose-rate-based limits make it possible to account for patient-specific differences in lung geometry. This is particularly important, for example, in pediatric patients exhibiting diffuse lung metastases. The approach also highlights the impact of altered radioiodine kinetics as seen with recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone. METHODS: The dose-rate constraint (DRC) was defined as the absorbed dose rate to the lungs of the adult female reference phantom when 80 mCi of (131)I are in the body and 90% of this is uniformly distributed in the lungs. With this definition, the 80-mCi rule was generalized by calculating the activity required to yield a dose rate equal to DRC using lung-to-lung S factor values corresponding to different reference phantoms. RESULTS: A DRC value of 43.6 cGy/h was obtained. Applying this DRC to the adult male phantom and to the phantom of a 15-y-old yields equivalent 48-h activity limits of 3.72 GBq (101 mCi) and 2.45 GBq (66.2 mCi), respectively. Depending on model parameters, the absorbed doses to lungs ranged from 57 to 112 Gy; the photon-only portion, which better reflects the dose to normal lung parenchyma, ranged from 4.9 to 55 Gy. CONCLUSION: A dose-rate-based version of the 80-mCi rule is derived and used to demonstrate application of this rule to pediatric patients and to adult male patients. The implications of the 80-mCi rule are also examined. The assumption of uniform energy deposition in the lungs leads to substantially overestimated absorbed doses. Severe radiation-induced lung toxicity, expected at normal lung absorbed doses of 25-27 Gy, is avoided, probably because most of the local electron dose is delivered to tumor tissue instead of to normal lung parenchyma. The possibility of using a DRC to adjust treatment for different clinical situations is illustrated. The analysis suggests that a dosimetry-based approach will be particularly important in the treatment of patients with lung metastases when a recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone protocol is used.
Authors: B Emami; J Lyman; A Brown; L Coia; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; B Shank; L J Solin; M Wesson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-05-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Robert Dorn; Juergen Kopp; Harry Vogt; Peter Heidenreich; Robert G Carroll; Seza A Gulec Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Heribert Hänscheid; Michael Lassmann; Markus Luster; Stephen R Thomas; Furio Pacini; Claudia Ceccarelli; Paul W Ladenson; Richard L Wahl; Martin Schlumberger; Marcel Ricard; Al Driedger; Richard T Kloos; Steven I Sherman; Bryan R Haugen; Vincent Carriere; Carine Corone; Christoph Reiners Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hong Song; Bin He; Andrew Prideaux; Yong Du; Eric Frey; Wayne Kasecamp; Paul W Ladenson; Richard L Wahl; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: O W Press; J F Eary; F R Appelbaum; P J Martin; C C Badger; W B Nelp; S Glenn; G Butchko; D Fisher; B Porter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gary L Francis; Steven G Waguespack; Andrew J Bauer; Peter Angelos; Salvatore Benvenga; Janete M Cerutti; Catherine A Dinauer; Jill Hamilton; Ian D Hay; Markus Luster; Marguerite T Parisi; Marianna Rachmiel; Geoffrey B Thompson; Shunichi Yamashita Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Scott A Rivkees; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Frederik A Verburg; Christoph Reiners; Markus Luster; Christopher K Breuer; Catherine A Dinauer; Robert Udelsman Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Hong Song; Bin He; Andrew Prideaux; Yong Du; Eric Frey; Wayne Kasecamp; Paul W Ladenson; Richard L Wahl; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert F Hobbs; Richard L Wahl; Martin A Lodge; Mehrbod S Javadi; Steve Y Cho; David T Chien; Marge E Ewertz; Caroline E Esaias; Paul W Ladenson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Lutz S Freudenberg; Walter Jentzen; Stefan P Müller; Andreas Bockisch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: José Willegaignon; Rogério Alexandre Pelissoni; Beatriz Christine de Godoy Diniz Lima; Marcelo Tatit Sapienza; George Barberio Coura-Filho; Marcelo Araújo Queiroz; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2016 May-Jun
Authors: Caroline Stokke; Pablo Minguez Gabiña; Pavel Solný; Francesco Cicone; Mattias Sandström; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Carlo Chiesa; Emiliano Spezi; Maria Paphiti; Mark Konijnenberg; Matt Aldridge; Jill Tipping; Michael Wissmeyer; Boudewijn Brans; Klaus Bacher; Carsten Kobe; Glenn Flux Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2017-11-21