Literature DB >> 17138581

Plastid division: evolution, mechanism and complexity.

Jodi Maple1, Simon Geir Møller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continuity of chloroplasts is maintained by division of pre-existing chloroplasts. Chloroplasts originated as bacterial endosymbionts; however, the majority of bacterial division factors are absent from chloroplasts and the eukaryotic host has added several new components. For example, the ftsZ gene has been duplicated and modified, and the Min system has retained MinE and MinD but lost MinC, acquiring at least one new component ARC3. Further, the mechanism has evolved to include two members of the dynamin protein family, ARC5 and FZL, and plastid-dividing (PD) rings were most probably added by the eukaryotic host. SCOPE: Deciphering how the division of plastids is coordinated and controlled by nuclear-encoded factors is key to our understanding of this important biological process. Through a number of molecular-genetic and biochemical approaches, it is evident that FtsZ initiates plastid division where the coordinated action of MinD and MinE ensures correct FtsZ (Z)-ring placement. Although the classical FtsZ antagonist MinC does not exist in plants, ARC3 may fulfil this role. Together with other prokaryotic-derived proteins such as ARC6 and GC1 and key eukaryotic-derived proteins such as ARC5 and FZL, these proteins make up a sophisticated division machinery. The regulation of plastid division in a cellular context is largely unknown; however, recent microarray data shed light on this. Here the current understanding of the mechanism of chloroplast division in higher plants is reviewed with an emphasis on how recent findings are beginning to shape our understanding of the function and evolution of the components.
CONCLUSIONS: Extrapolation from the mechanism of bacterial cell division provides valuable clues as to how the chloroplast division process is achieved in plant cells. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the highly regulated mechanism of plastid division within the host cell has led to the evolution of features unique to the plastid division process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17138581      PMCID: PMC2802928          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  142 in total

1.  Plastid division is driven by a complex mechanism that involves differential transition of the bacterial and eukaryotic division rings.

Authors:  M Takahara; T Mori; H Kuroiwa; T Higashiyama; T Kuroiwa
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Themes and variations in prokaryotic cell division.

Authors:  W Margolin
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Dark-stimulated calcium ion fluxes in the chloroplast stroma and cytosol.

Authors:  Jiqing Sai; Carl Hirschie Johnson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Self-activation of guanosine triphosphatase activity by oligomerization of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ.

Authors:  T M Sossong; M R Brigham-Burke; P Hensley; K H Pearce
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Cloning, expression, and characterization of the Escherichia coli K-12 rfaD gene.

Authors:  J C Pegues; L S Chen; A W Gordon; L Ding; W G Coleman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  MscS-like proteins control plastid size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Haswell; Elliot M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  A dynamin-like protein (ADL2b), rather than FtsZ, is involved in Arabidopsis mitochondrial division.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Arimura; Nobuhiro Tsutsumi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  FZL, an FZO-like protein in plants, is a determinant of thylakoid and chloroplast morphology.

Authors:  Hongbo Gao; Tammy L Sage; Katherine W Osteryoung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Manipulation of light signal transduction as a means of modifying fruit nutritional quality in tomato.

Authors:  Yongsheng Liu; Sherry Roof; Zhibiao Ye; Cornelius Barry; Ageeth van Tuinen; Julia Vrebalov; Chris Bowler; Jim Giovannoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spinach CSP41, an mRNA-binding protein and ribonuclease, is homologous to nucleotide-sugar epimerases and hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases.

Authors:  M E Baker; W N Grundy; C P Elkan
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1998-07-20       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  19 in total

1.  An integrated physiological and genetic approach to the dynamics of FtsZ targeting and organisation in a moss, Physcomitrella patens.

Authors:  I Suppanz; E Sarnighausen; R Reski
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 2.  Chloroplast envelope membranes: a dynamic interface between plastids and the cytosol.

Authors:  Maryse A Block; Roland Douce; Jacques Joyard; Norbert Rolland
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Two mechanosensitive channel homologs influence division ring placement in Arabidopsis chloroplasts.

Authors:  Margaret E Wilson; Gregory S Jensen; Elizabeth S Haswell
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  The chloroplast division mutant caa33 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the crucial impact of chloroplast homeostasis on stress acclimation and retrograde plastid-to-nucleus signaling.

Authors:  Klára Šimková; Chanhong Kim; Katarzyna Gacek; Aiswarya Baruah; Christophe Laloi; Klaus Apel
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  The PLASTID DIVISION1 and 2 components of the chloroplast division machinery determine the rate of chloroplast division in land plant cell differentiation.

Authors:  Kumiko Okazaki; Yukihiro Kabeya; Kenji Suzuki; Toshiyuki Mori; Takanari Ichikawa; Minami Matsui; Hiromitsu Nakanishi; Shin-Ya Miyagishima
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  The evolution of the regulatory mechanism of chloroplast division.

Authors:  Kumiko Okazaki; Yukihiro Kabeya; Shin-ya Miyagishima
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-02-28

7.  Copper response regulator1-dependent and -independent responses of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii transcriptome to dark anoxia.

Authors:  Anja Hemschemeier; David Casero; Bensheng Liu; Christoph Benning; Matteo Pellegrini; Thomas Happe; Sabeeha S Merchant
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Arabidopsis ARC6 coordinates the division machineries of the inner and outer chloroplast membranes through interaction with PDV2 in the intermembrane space.

Authors:  Jonathan M Glynn; John E Froehlich; Katherine W Osteryoung
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Genetic mapping and isolation of two arc3 alleles in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Deng Pan; Yuhong Shi; Xia Liu; Yuefang Gao; Zhonghua Liu; Hongbo Gao
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals genes involved in plastid/chloroplast division and development are regulated by the HP1/DDB1 at an early stage of tomato fruit development.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tang; Zizhi Tang; Shengxiong Huang; Jikai Liu; Jia Liu; Wei Shi; Xuefen Tian; Yuxiang Li; Danfeng Zhang; Jian Yang; Yongfeng Gao; Deer Zeng; Pei Hou; Xiangli Niu; Ying Cao; Guangwei Li; Xiao Li; Fangming Xiao; Yongsheng Liu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.