Literature DB >> 17138279

Which cues are available to 24-month-olds? Evidence from point-of-gaze measures during search.

Heidi Kloos1, Jeffrey M Haddad, Rachel Keen.   

Abstract

In previous research 2-year-olds have failed to show knowledge of solidity in a search task in which a ball rolled behind a screen and was stopped by a barrier. The screen had four doors and the barrier was visible above the door hiding the ball. To establish what cues 2-year-olds might be using, precise point-of-gaze measures were taken during the hiding event. A transparent screen with opaque doors provided two cues: (1) the ball could be tracked until it failed to emerge, and (2) the barrier's position could indicate the correct door. Point-of-gaze measures revealed that children failed to use the more indirect cue of the barrier, which requires reasoning and spatial integration. Their search success was predicted only by the more immediate cue of actively tracking the ball. These findings support the claim that children use best those cues directly related to the object's disappearance, while failing to use cues that entail higher cognitive demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17138279     DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infant Behav Dev        ISSN: 0163-6383


  3 in total

Review 1.  Object and event representation in toddlers.

Authors:  Rachel Keen; Kristin Shutts
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

2.  Conflicting cues in a dynamic search task are reflected in children's eye movements and search errors.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Haddad; Heidi Kloos; Rachel Keen
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07

3.  A "bat" is easier to learn than a "tab": effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning.

Authors:  Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez; Silvana Poltrock; Thierry Nazzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.