Literature DB >> 17138194

Increase in skin temperature after spinal anesthesia in infants.

Martin Jetzek-Zader1, Henning Hermanns, Rainer Freynhagen, Peter Lipfert, Markus F Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relatively stable hemodynamics during spinal anesthesia in infants have been attributed to a less active sympathetic nervous system in comparison with adults. Thus, the authors evaluated sympathetic block primarily by measurement of skin temperature and secondarily by determination of noninvasive blood pressure as an indirect sign of sympatholysis.
METHODS: In 15 infants (postconceptual age: 45.0 +/- 4.8 weeks; weight: 4.0 +/- 1.2 kg) scheduled for repair of inguinal hernia under spinal anesthesia, skin temperature at the T4 level and at the plantar foot was measured before and after spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was induced at the L4/L5 interspace with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 1 mg/kg with 10 microg/kg adrenaline added.
RESULTS: Temperature at the plantar foot after spinal anesthesia rose significantly from 33.0 degrees C +/- 1.3 degrees C to 34.7 degrees C +/- 1.4 degrees C within 10 minutes and to 35.6 degrees C +/- 0.9 degrees C after 20 minutes (P < .0001), whereas the temperature at the thorax remained constant at 35 degrees C to 36 degrees C. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 15.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg and 9.0 +/- 9.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < .01), but remained within normal range in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a significant increase in skin temperature of the feet within 10 minutes as a sign of sympatholysis, whereas trunk temperature remained constant. Blood pressure decreased but remained within the normal range, despite the observed sympatholysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17138194     DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  1 in total

1.  [Increase in skin surface temperature in spinal anesthesia. Predictive value for probability of surgical tolerance].

Authors:  A Penno; M Arumugam; G Antweiler; T Laubert; J Habermann; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.