Literature DB >> 17137454

Perinatal care at the borderlines of viability: a consensus statement based on a NSW and ACT consensus workshop.

Kei Lui1, Barbara Bajuk, Kirsty Foster, Arnolda Gaston, Alison Kent, John Sinn, Kaye Spence, Wendy Fischer, David Henderson-Smart.   

Abstract

Perinatal care at the borderlines of viability demands a delicate balance between parents' wishes and autonomy, biological feasibility, clinicians' responsibilities and expectations, and the prospects of an acceptable long-term outcome - coupled with a tolerable margin of uncertainty. A multi-professional workshop with consumer involvement was held in February 2005 to agree on management of this issue in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. Participants discussed and formulated consensus statements after an extensive consultation process. Consensus was reached that the "grey zone" is between 23 weeks' and 25 weeks and 6 days' gestation. While there is an increasing obligation to treat with increasing length of gestation, it is acceptable medical practice not to initiate intensive care during this period if parents so wish, after appropriate counselling. Poor condition at birth and the presence of serious congenital anomalies have an important influence on any decision not to initiate intensive care within the grey zone. Women at high risk of imminent delivery within the grey zone should receive appropriate and skilled counselling with the most relevant up-to-date outcome information. Management plans can thus be made before birth. Information should be simple, factual and consistent. The consensus statements developed will provide a framework to assist parents and clinicians in communication, decision making and managing these challenging situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17137454     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  16 in total

1.  The nonimpact of gestational age on neurodevelopmental outcome for ventilated survivors born at 23-28 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Bree Andrews; Joanne Lagatta; Alison Chu; Susan Plesha-Troyke; Michael Schreiber; John Lantos; William Meadow
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Treatment of preterm infants at the lower margin of viability--a comparison of guidelines in German speaking countries.

Authors:  Roland Hentschel; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: a prognosis-based guideline.

Authors:  B Lemyre; T Daboval; S Dunn; M Kekewich; G Jones; D Wang; M Mason-Ward; G P Moore
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Deficiencies and Missed Opportunities to Formulate Clinical Guidelines in Australia for Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severely Disabled and Impaired Infants.

Authors:  Neera Bhatia; James Tibballs
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Shared decision making during antenatal counselling for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Conor Barker; Sandra Dunn; Gregory P Moore; Jessica Reszel; Brigitte Lemyre; Thierry Daboval
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Robert Truog; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.898

7.  Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis?

Authors:  Lynn Gillam; Dominic Wilkinson; Vicki Xafis; David Isaacs
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.954

8.  Retrospective cohort study of all deaths among infants born between 22 and 27 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland over a 3-year period.

Authors:  T M Berger; M A Steurer; H U Bucher; J C Fauchère; M Adams; R E Pfister; R Baumann-Hölzle; D Bassler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development.

Authors:  Hester M van de Bovenkamp; Margo J Trappenburg
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-12-20

Review 10.  Factors influencing the care provided for periviable babies in Australia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Robin Ray; Sarah Larkins; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.