Literature DB >> 17137051

Comparison of morphine and carprofen administered alone or in combination for analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

T B Dzikiti1, K E Joubert, L J Venter, L N Dzikiti.   

Abstract

In this study the analgesic efficacy of the pure agonistic opioid morphine and the cyclo-oxygenase type-2-selective carprofen were compared since there is no previous specific comparative study for these two common analgesics. Forty-five bitches undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy were randomly assigned to one of three groups; receiving morphine 0.4 mg/kg bodyweight pre-operatively and 0.2 mg/kg every 4-6 hours thereafter (Morphine group), receiving a once-off carprofen 4 mg/kg injection (Carprofen group) or receiving both morphine and carprofen (MorphCarp group). The dogs were premedicated with acepromazine 0.01 mg/kg and induced with either thiopentone 5-10 mg/kg or propofol 4-6 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was maintained with halothane in oxygen. The degree of pain was assessed over a 24-hour period under blinded conditions using a pain scale modified from the University of Melbourne pain scale and the Glasgow composite pain tool. Physiological parameters such as respiratory rate, pulse rate and body temperature were also assessed over the same time period. There was no significant difference in pain-scores and thus analgesia offered by the three analgesia protocols at any assessment point across the three groups, but there were differences within groups across time points. Baseline total pain-scores were lower than scores at all post-operative points within all three groups. Both morphine and carprofen provided good analgesia without any obvious adverse effects. This study indicates that at the dosages indicated above, carprofen administered on its own produces analgesia equal to that produced by morphine and that the two drugs administered together do not produce better analgesia than either drug administered on its own.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17137051     DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v77i3.358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc        ISSN: 1019-9128            Impact factor:   1.474


  6 in total

1.  Perioperative analgesic use by Ontario veterinarians, 2012.

Authors:  Jessica Reimann; Cate Dewey; Shane W Bateman; Carolyn Kerr; Ron Johnson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Comparison of carprofen and tramadol for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing enucleation.

Authors:  Cherlene Delgado; Ellison Bentley; Scott Hetzel; Lesley J Smith
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Validation of orthopedic postoperative pain assessment methods for dogs: a prospective, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Pascale Rialland; Simon Authier; Martin Guillot; Jérôme R E Del Castillo; Daphnée Veilleux-Lemieux; Diane Frank; Dominique Gauvin; Eric Troncy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cortisol concentration, pain and sedation scale in free roaming dogs treated with carprofen after ovariohysterectomy.

Authors:  Katarina Nenadović; Marijana Vučinić; Brana Radenković-Damnjanović; Ljiljana Janković; Radislava Teodorović; Eva Voslarova; Zsolt Becskei
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-08-09

5.  A systematic review of analgesia practices in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Authors:  Willy E Mwangi; Eddy M Mogoa; James N Mwangi; Paul G Mbuthia; Susan W Mbugua
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-12-25

6.  Clinical Assessment of Introducing Locoregional Anaesthesia Techniques as Part as the Intraoperative Analgesia Management for Canine Ovariohysterectomy in a Veterinary Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Jaime Viscasillas; Ariel Cañón; Eva Hernández; Agustín Martínez; Reyes Marti-Scharfhausen; Pilar Lafuente; José Ignacio Redondo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.