Literature DB >> 17136961

U.S. regulatory perspective on the minimal clinically important difference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Robert J Meyer1.   

Abstract

This paper outlines the regulatory issues surrounding the determination and use of minimally clinically important differences (MCID) in assessing measures of outcomes from treatments of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To place this discussion in context, it is important to understand the current state of approved therapies for COPD, as well as newer directions in therapy. This paper discusses the currently available, approved drug therapies for COPD in the United States and how they were approved. This is followed by an overview on the use of MCID for assessing outcomes in therapies for COPD, as well the more general experience with MCID from the U.S. regulatory perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17136961     DOI: 10.1081/copd-200050660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  COPD        ISSN: 1541-2563            Impact factor:   2.409


  3 in total

1.  Assessing the meaningful change threshold of Quality of Life in Depression Scale using data from two phase 3 studies of esketamine nasal spray.

Authors:  Heather Rozjabek; Nan Li; Holger Hartmann; Dong Jing Fu; Carla Canuso; Carol Jamieson
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-10

2.  Defining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Heinrichs-carpenter quality of life scale (QLS).

Authors:  Bruno Falissard; Christophe Sapin; Jean-Yves Loze; Wally Landsberg; Karina Hansen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  V0162 a new long-acting bronchodilator for treatment of chronic obstructive lung diseases: preclinical and clinical results.

Authors:  Philippe Devillier; Eric Garrigue; Guillaume D'Auzers; Nicolas Monjotin; Thomas Similowski; Thierry Clerc
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2015-06-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.