Literature DB >> 17136960

Challenges associated with estimating minimal clinically important differences in COPD-the NHLBI perspective.

James P Kiley1, J Sri Ram, Thomas L Croxton, Gail G Weinmann.   

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common lung disease that exemplifies the value, as well as the difficulties and challenges, of using minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in clinical research. Development and validation of better endpoints for clinical studies is critical to research progress in COPD. However, the clinical, genetic, and pharmacological heterogeneity of the COPD patient population complicates attempts to define and validate MCIDs for COPD. It is difficult to identify a single measurable outcome that reflects the many components of the COPD patient's health state. Acute exacerbations of symptoms, which COPD patients often experience, present another challenge in the development of MCIDs for this disease. Consequently, the NHLBI does not require the use of MCIDs in clinical research. This allows research on the causes, prevention and diagnosis of COPD and use of endpoints for which an MCID is not yet known. It is important for the scientific community to reach agreement on what is a meaningful MCID in therapeutic trials for COPD. Further research into the concept of the MCID and its application should enable therapeutic trials in COPD to yield knowledge that is more effectively translated into improved public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17136960     DOI: 10.1081/copd-200050649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  COPD        ISSN: 1541-2563            Impact factor:   2.409


  7 in total

1.  The London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale cut-off point to discriminate functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Aline Almeida Gulart; Anelise Bauer Munari; Suelen Roberta Klein; Raysa Silva Venâncio; Hellen Fontão Alexandre; Anamaria Fleig Mayer
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Biobehavioral measures as outcomes: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Christine R Kovach; Diana Lynn Woods; Elizabeth C Devine; Brent R Logan; Hershel Raff
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 1.571

Review 3.  [Clinical value of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Authors:  Adrian Gillissen; Thomas Glaab; Roland Buhl
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2009-02-26

4.  Impact of Lung Function and Exacerbations on Health-Related Quality of Life in COPD Patients Within One Year: Real-World Analysis Based on Claims Data.

Authors:  Alisa Stöber; Johanna I Lutter; Larissa Schwarzkopf; Florian Kirsch; Anja Schramm; Claus F Vogelmeier; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2021-09-21

5.  Healthcare Professionals' Preferred Efficacy Endpoints and Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Assessment of New Medicines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Marloes Dankers; Marjorie H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken; Sara M K Surminski; Anke C Lambooij; Tjard R Schermer; Liset van Dijk
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-5L in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Mingxia Jing; Mei Zhang; Ping Yang; Xiaolong Yan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  The Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) in Annual Rate of Change of Timed Function Tests in Boys with DMD.

Authors:  Tina Duong; Jennifer Canbek; Marisa Birkmeier; Leslie Nelson; Catherine Siener; Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez; Erik Henricson; Craig M McDonald; Heather Gordish-Dressman
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2021
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.