Literature DB >> 17136591

Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students.

Jason Weeden1, John Sabini.   

Abstract

This study examined both self-rated and objectively measured attractiveness in relation to sexual behaviors and attitudes in an undergraduate sample (N=456). About a quarter of the variance in self-ratings of attractiveness was predicted from combining standard objective measures of attractiveness, including face photo ratings, body mass index, and chest-to-waist ratio for men, and face photo ratings, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio for women. Correlations were investigated among self-rated attractiveness, measured attractiveness, the residual component of self-rated attractiveness (controlling for measured attractiveness), and a number of sexual and related variables. Measured attractiveness correlated moderately with sexual behaviors but not with sociosexuality or sexual moral attitudes, indicating that higher levels of observable attractiveness may serve to increase opportunities for sex with multiple desirable partners without affecting interests in or moral acceptance of casual sex. Self-rated attractiveness correlated positively with sexual behaviors and with sociosexuality, but the correlation with sociosexuality was based entirely on residual factors beyond the objective measures of attractiveness. Other predictors of sexual behavior were discussed in terms of their variable roles in affecting interest in, opportunities for, and social costs of promiscuous sexual activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17136591     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  19 in total

1.  How do you feel when you check your body? Emotional states during a body-checking episode in normal-weight females.

Authors:  Leonie Wilhelm; Andrea S Hartmann; Martin Cordes; Manuel Waldorf; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Individual differences in reproductive strategy are related to views about recreational drug use in Belgium, The Netherlands, and Japan.

Authors:  Katinka J P Quintelier; Keiko Ishii; Jason Weeden; Robert Kurzban; Johan Braeckman
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-06

3.  Body Covering and Body Image: A Comparison of Veiled and Unveiled Muslim Women, Christian Women, and Atheist Women Regarding Body Checking, Body Dissatisfaction, and Eating Disorder Symptoms.

Authors:  Leonie Wilhelm; Andrea S Hartmann; Julia C Becker; Melahat Kişi; Manuel Waldorf; Silja Vocks
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-10

4.  Religiosity, spirituality, sexual attitudes, and sexual behaviors among college students.

Authors:  Raffy R Luquis; Gina M Brelsford; Liliana Rojas-Guyler
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2012-09

5.  Religious Attendance as Reproductive Support.

Authors:  Jason Weeden; Adam B Cohen; Douglas T Kenrick
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.178

6.  Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20 century United States.

Authors:  Markus Jokela
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.178

7.  Sex, drugs and moral goals: reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs.

Authors:  Robert Kurzban; Amber Dukes; Jason Weeden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The association between sexual satisfaction and body image in women.

Authors:  Yasisca Pujols; Brooke N Seal; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Exploring Latino College Students' Sexual Behaviors in Relation to Their Sexual Attitudes, Religiousness, and Spirituality.

Authors:  Raffy R Luquis; Gina M Brelsford; Miguel A Pérez
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2015-08

10.  Potentials-attract or likes-attract in human mate choice in China.

Authors:  Qiao-Qiao He; Zhen Zhang; Jian-Xin Zhang; Zhi-Guo Wang; Ying Tu; Ting Ji; Yi Tao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.