Literature DB >> 17136553

Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging.

Nehal Saleh1, Lars Chittka.   

Abstract

To test the relative importance of long-term and working spatial memories in short-range foraging in bumblebees, we compared the performance of two groups of bees. One group foraged in a stable array of six flowers for 40 foraging bouts, thereby enabling it to establish a long-term memory of the array, and adjust its spatial movements accordingly. The other group was faced with an array that changed between (but not within) foraging bouts, and thus had only access to a working memory of the flowers that had been visited. Bees in the stable array started out sampling a variety of routes, but their tendency to visit flowers in a repeatable, stable order ("traplining") increased drastically with experience. These bees used shorter routes and converged on four popular paths. However, these routes were mainly formed through linking pairs of flowers by near-neighbour movements, rather than attempting to minimize overall travel distance. Individuals had variations to a primary sequence, where some bees used a major sequence most often, followed by a minor less used route, and others used two different routes with equal frequency. Even though bees foraging in the spatially randomized array had access to both spatial working memory and scent marks, this manipulation greatly disrupted foraging efficiency, mainly via an increase in revisitation to previously emptied flowers and substantially longer search times. Hence, a stable reference frame greatly improves foraging even for bees in relatively small arrays of flowers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17136553     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0607-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees.

Authors:  Johannes Spaethe; Lars Chittka
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants.

Authors:  D H Janzen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Honey bees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel; Uwe Greggers; Alan Smith; Sandra Berger; Robert Brandt; Sascha Brunke; Gesine Bundrock; Sandra Hülse; Tobias Plümpe; Frank Schaupp; Elke Schüttler; Silke Stach; Jan Stindt; Nicola Stollhoff; Sebastian Watzl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Response of traplining bumble bees to competition experiments: shifts in feeding location and efficiency.

Authors:  J D Thomson; S C Peterson; L D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Consensus methods for DNA and protein sequence alignment.

Authors:  M S Waterman; R Jones
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Bees travel novel homeward routes by integrating separately acquired vector memories

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Route finding by rats in an open arena.

Authors:  Rebecca A Reid; Alliston K Reid
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae).

Authors:  James D Thomson; Wayne P Maddison; R C Plowright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Parasitoidism, not sociality, is associated with the evolution of elaborate mushroom bodies in the brains of hymenopteran insects.

Authors:  Sarah M Farris; Susanne Schulmeister
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants.

Authors:  Kazuharu Ohashi; James D Thomson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Learning from learning and memory in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andre J Riveros; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-09

4.  Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Helene Muller
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

5.  Disc size regulation in the brood cell building behavior of leaf-cutter bee, Megachile tsurugensis.

Authors:  Jong-yoon Kim
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-06-12

6.  Bees do not use nearest-neighbour rules for optimization of multi-location routes.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Lars Chittka; Steven C Le Comber; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Trade-off between travel distance and prioritization of high-reward sites in traplining bumblebees.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Lars Chittka; Nigel E Raine; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.608

8.  Unravelling the mechanisms of trapline foraging in bees.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Nigel E Raine; Andrew M Reynolds; Ralph J Stelzer; Ka S Lim; Alan D Smith; Juliet L Osborne; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2013-01-01

9.  Radar tracking and motion-sensitive cameras on flowers reveal the development of pollinator multi-destination routes over large spatial scales.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Nigel E Raine; Andrew M Reynolds; Ralph J Stelzer; Ka S Lim; Alan D Smith; Juliet L Osborne; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A simple iterative model accurately captures complex trapline formation by bumblebees across spatial scales and flower arrangements.

Authors:  Andrew M Reynolds; Mathieu Lihoreau; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.