OBJECTIVES: To compare students' performance in and course evaluations for a clinical pharmacokinetics course taught in a traditional classroom setting, and for the same course taught via interactive videoconferencing. METHODS: The course was taught in a traditional classroom setting to 38 students, and in asynchronous sessions via interactive videoconferencing to 75 students at a distant site. A course evaluation was administered to each group at the conclusion of the courses. RESULTS: The students in the live classroom setting had a higher mean final course grade of 90.7% compared to the mean final course grade (87.8%) of students in the interactive videoconferencing group (P = 0.024). The mean evaluation score for students in the videoconferencing class were higher than for students in the live classroom setting (4.73 vs. 4.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Students in both the classroom setting and interactive videoconferencing setting performed well and had a high overall perception of the course.
OBJECTIVES: To compare students' performance in and course evaluations for a clinical pharmacokinetics course taught in a traditional classroom setting, and for the same course taught via interactive videoconferencing. METHODS: The course was taught in a traditional classroom setting to 38 students, and in asynchronous sessions via interactive videoconferencing to 75 students at a distant site. A course evaluation was administered to each group at the conclusion of the courses. RESULTS: The students in the live classroom setting had a higher mean final course grade of 90.7% compared to the mean final course grade (87.8%) of students in the interactive videoconferencing group (P = 0.024). The mean evaluation score for students in the videoconferencing class were higher than for students in the live classroom setting (4.73 vs. 4.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Students in both the classroom setting and interactive videoconferencing setting performed well and had a high overall perception of the course.
Authors: Jacqueline E McLaughlin; LaToya M Griffin; Denise A Esserman; Christopher A Davidson; Dylan M Glatt; Mary T Roth; Nastaran Gharkholonarehe; Russell J Mumper Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Jennifer Padden Elliott; Pamela Hucko Koerner; Jennifer Heasley; Khalid M Kamal Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 2.047