Literature DB >> 17134738

Immunohistochemistry of primary malignant neuroepithelial tumors of the kidney: a potential source of confusion? A study of 30 cases from the National Wilms Tumor Study Pathology Center.

Dale A Ellison1, David M Parham, Julia Bridge, J Bruce Beckwith.   

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pPNET) is a rare primary tumor of the kidney with morphologic features similar to those of other primitive tumors. Previous studies have shown that these tumors frequently stain positively with immunostains against CD99 and FLI-1 and negatively with stains against WT-1, suggesting that these markers may be used for the distinction between Wilms tumor and pPNET. We present 30 cases of primary malignant neuroepithelial tumor with immunohistochemical profiles and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis and show that immunophenotypic overlap exists between Wilms tumor and pPNET. A subset of 30 neuroepithelial tumors from the National Wilms Tumor Study originally categorized as putative pPNETs of the kidney was stained with FLI-1, WT-1, and thyroid transcription factor-1. Bicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were performed on 19 of the cases. Other data on these tumors were available from a previous study (Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:133). Of 7 primary tumors that had the EWS/FLI-1 fusion transcript by RT-PCR, 6 exhibited strong immunopositivity for FLI-1. Nine that were negative by RT-PCR stained positively with the FLI-1 stain. Five fusion-negative cases stained with both FLI-1 and WT-1. Three fusion-negative cases were negative for FLI-1 but positive for WT-1. Five fusion-negative cases were negative for both FLI-1 and WT-1. Of the 30 cases, 29 were positive for CD99. Seven cases that were negative for the EWS-FLI-1 fusion by RT-PCR were positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization. All cases were negative for thyroid transcription factor-1. Reliance upon immunohistochemistry as the sole means of ancillary diagnosis in renal pPNET can lead to confusing results. We recommend molecular fusion studies for clarification of primitive renal tumors with unexpected immunophenotypic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17134738     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor and related tumors.

Authors:  Maria Tsokos; Rita D Alaggio; Louis P Dehner; Paul S Dickman
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2012

2.  Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney at the advanced stage: A case series of eight Chinese patients.

Authors:  Qipeng Sun; Bin Miao; Xiangming Lao; Ping Yuan; Jiarong Cai; Hailun Zhan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-19

3.  Uterine tumors with neuroectodermal differentiation. A report of 4 cases.

Authors:  Pavel Dundr; Daniela Fischerová; Ctibor Povýšil; Adéla Berková; Lenka Bauerová; David Cibula
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Renal primitive neuroectodermal tumor: does age at diagnosis impact outcomes?

Authors:  Mahdi Aghili; Elham Rafiei; Mohamad Mojahed; Mahkameh Zare
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2012-03-28

5.  Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: two unusual presentations of a rare tumor.

Authors:  E C Castro; A V Parwani
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2012-01-24

6.  Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney in a young male: Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Nivedita Patnaik; Kiran Mishra; Pradeep Saini; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  Primary Ewing Sarcoma/Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Kidney: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Nidale Tarek; Rabih Said; Clark R Andersen; Tina S Suki; Jessica Foglesong; Cynthia E Herzog; Nizar M Tannir; Shreyaskumar Patel; Ravin Ratan; Joseph A Ludwig; Najat C Daw
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.