OBJECTIVE: To compare gene transfer of plasmid (P) and adenovirus (Ad) encoding human vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 (hVEGF-A165) angiogenic efficacy and adverse effects as regards apoptosis and ectopic expression of the transgene in a rat myocardial infarction model. METHODS: Myocardial infarction was provoked in Fisher rats. One week later, PhVEGF-A165, PLacZ, AdhVEGF-A165, or AdLacZ was transferred intramyocardially along the border of the myocardial infarction. hVEGF-A expression was detected with ELISA. Myocardial vessel density was analyzed 1 and 4 weeks after gene transfer. Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL staining. Cardiac function was assessed with Tissue Doppler Velocity Imaging. RESULTS: Although AdhVEGF-A165 had substantially higher myocardial hVEGF-A expression than PhVEGF-A165, AdhVEGF-A165 and PhVEGF-A165 induced angiogenic effects to a similar extent with maintained increased arteriolar density after 4 weeks of gene transfer (p < 0.05). The two treatments also improved left ventricular function similarly. Adenoviral gene transfer induced a higher number of TUNEL positive cells than plasmid (p < 0.02). Ectopic expression of the transgene was present with both vectors but substantially higher after adenoviral gene transfer. CONCLUSIONS: AdhVEGF-A165 has no obvious angiogenic advantage over PhVEGF-A165 but more side effects at least in a rat myocardial infarction model. This indicates that PhVEGF-A165 might be more applicable for therapeutic angiogenesis than AdhVEGF-A165.
OBJECTIVE: To compare gene transfer of plasmid (P) and adenovirus (Ad) encoding humanvascular endothelial growth factor-A165 (hVEGF-A165) angiogenic efficacy and adverse effects as regards apoptosis and ectopic expression of the transgene in a ratmyocardial infarction model. METHODS:Myocardial infarction was provoked in Fisher rats. One week later, PhVEGF-A165, PLacZ, AdhVEGF-A165, or AdLacZ was transferred intramyocardially along the border of the myocardial infarction. hVEGF-A expression was detected with ELISA. Myocardial vessel density was analyzed 1 and 4 weeks after gene transfer. Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL staining. Cardiac function was assessed with Tissue Doppler Velocity Imaging. RESULTS: Although AdhVEGF-A165 had substantially higher myocardial hVEGF-A expression than PhVEGF-A165, AdhVEGF-A165 and PhVEGF-A165 induced angiogenic effects to a similar extent with maintained increased arteriolar density after 4 weeks of gene transfer (p < 0.05). The two treatments also improved left ventricular function similarly. Adenoviral gene transfer induced a higher number of TUNEL positive cells than plasmid (p < 0.02). Ectopic expression of the transgene was present with both vectors but substantially higher after adenoviral gene transfer. CONCLUSIONS: AdhVEGF-A165 has no obvious angiogenic advantage over PhVEGF-A165 but more side effects at least in a ratmyocardial infarction model. This indicates that PhVEGF-A165 might be more applicable for therapeutic angiogenesis than AdhVEGF-A165.
Authors: Lior Zangi; Kathy O Lui; Alexander von Gise; Qing Ma; Wataru Ebina; Leon M Ptaszek; Daniela Später; Huansheng Xu; Mohammadsharif Tabebordbar; Rostic Gorbatov; Brena Sena; Matthias Nahrendorf; David M Briscoe; Ronald A Li; Amy J Wagers; Derrick J Rossi; William T Pu; Kenneth R Chien Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: James W Yockman; Andrew Kastenmeier; Harold M Erickson; Jonathan G Brumbach; Matthew G Whitten; Aida Albanil; Dean Y Li; Sung Wan Kim; David A Bull Journal: J Control Release Date: 2008-07-06 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Kathy O Lui; Lior Zangi; Eduardo A Silva; Lei Bu; Makoto Sahara; Ronald A Li; David J Mooney; Kenneth R Chien Journal: Cell Res Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 25.617