Literature DB >> 17133871

Calling is an honest indicator of paternal genetic quality in poison frogs.

Anders Forsman1, Mattias Hagman.   

Abstract

Several competing hypotheses have been put forward to explain why females of many species mate preferentially with males possessing the most conspicuous signals (e.g., ornaments, displays, or songs). We performed a laboratory experiment using two species of poison frogs, Dendrobates leucomelas and Epipedobates tricolor, to test the hypothesis that male calling performance is an honest indicator of parental quality. Our analyses are based on data from behavioral observations of mating activities of captive-reared individuals (and their offspring) that were housed in terraria for four consecutive breeding seasons. Male mating success increased with male calling rate and chirp duration in both species, suggesting that females preferred males with more elaborate calls. Because calling performance improved with age in D. leucomelas, female poison frogs that prefer males with more elaborate calls in the wild may end up mating with older males that have already proven their ability to survive. Females that mated with good callers obtained higher quality offspring. Eggs fertilized by males with high calling rates and long chirp durations had higher hatching success and produced tadpoles that were more likely to metamorphose into surviving frogs. As a consequence, females that mated with males with high calling performance obtained more surviving offspring per egg, compared to females that mated with poor callers. Collectively, our findings comply with the notion that female poison frogs prefer to mate with good callers because calling performance is a reliable predictor of offspring quality. The possible influence of maternal allocation and reasons for the strong effect size compared to previous studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Evolution of advertisement calls in African clawed frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Ben J Evans; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.991

2.  Geographic variation in the advertisement calls of Hyla eximia and its possible explanations.

Authors:  Ruth E Rodríguez-Tejeda; María Guadalupe Méndez-Cárdenas; Valentina Islas-Villanueva; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Courtship song does not increase the rate of adaptation to a thermally stressful environment in a Drosophila melanogaster laboratory population.

Authors:  Larry G Cabral; Brett Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cross-generational comparison of reproductive success in recently caught strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Trinh T X Nguyen; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Designing better frog call recognition models.

Authors:  Paul S Crump; Jeff Houlahan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  From habitat use to social behavior: natural history of a voiceless poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius.

Authors:  Bibiana Rojas; Andrius Pašukonis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Sexual selection and the evolution of obligatory sex.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Tuvik Beker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.