Literature DB >> 17133869

No seasonal sex-ratio shift despite sex-specific fitness returns of hatching date in a lizard with genotypic sex determination.

Tobias Uller1, Mats Olsson.   

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that mothers should adjust their sex-specific reproductive investment in relation to the predicted fitness returns from sons versus daughters. Sex allocation theory has proved to be successful in some invertebrate taxa but data on vertebrates often fail to show the predicted shift in sex ratio or sex-specific resource investment. This is likely to be partly explained by simplistic assumptions of vertebrate life-history and mechanistic constraints, but also because the fundamental assumption of sex-specific fitness return on investment is rarely supported by empirical data. In short-lived species, the time of hatching or parturition can have a strong impact on the age and size at maturity. Thus, if selection favors adult sexual-size dimorphism, females can maximize their fitness by adjusting offspring sex over the reproductive season. We show that in mallee dragons, Ctenophorus fordi, date of hatching is positively related to female reproductive output but has little, if any, effect on male reproductive success, suggesting selection for a seasonal shift in offspring sex ratio. We used a combination of field and laboratory data collected over two years to test if female dragons adjust their sex allocation over the season to ensure an adaptive match between time of hatching and offspring sex. Contrary to our predictions, we found no effect of laying date on sex ratio, nor did we find any evidence for within-female between-clutch sex-ratio adjustment. Furthermore, there was no differential resource investment into male and female offspring within or between clutches and sex ratios did not correlate with female condition or any partner traits. Consequently, despite evidence for selection for a seasonal sex-ratio shift, female mallee dragons do not seem to exercise any control over sex determination. The results are discussed in relation to potential constraints on sex-ratio adjustment, alternative selection pressures, and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

1.  Sex-specific fitness returns are too weak to select for non-random patterns of sex allocation in a viviparous snake.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Baron; Thomas Tully; Jean-François Le Galliard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Consistent sex ratio bias of individual female dragon lizards.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Beth Mott; Gaetano Odierna; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Offspring size and timing of hatching determine survival and reproductive output in a lizard.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Molecular marker suggests rapid changes of sex-determining mechanisms in Australian dragon lizards.

Authors:  Tariq Ezaz; Alexander E Quinn; Stephen D Sarre; Denis O'Meally; Arthur Georges; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Conflict over condition-dependent sex allocation can lead to mixed sex-determination systems.

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Ido Pen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.694

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.