Literature DB >> 17133804

Distribution of virulent and pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in three molluscan shellfish species (Meretrix meretrix, Perna viridis, and Anadara granosa) and their association with foodborne disease in southern Thailand.

Varaporn Vuddhakul1, Supatinee Soboon, Wattanee Sunghiran, Sukhon Kaewpiboon, Ashrafuzzaman Chowdhury, Masanori Ishibashi, Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi, Mitsuaki Nishibuchi.   

Abstract

Distribution of pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood, particularly in molluscan shellfish, and their serological and molecular relationships to clinical strains were examined from Hat Yai City in southern Thailand. During 2000 to 2002, virulent strains (tdh+ or trh+) were isolated from 13 of 230 molluscan shellfish samples using alkaline peptone water enrichment followed by immunomagnetic separation. The isolates included 12 pandemic strains (tdh+, trh-, group-specific PCR positive) from five Oriental hard clam samples, five green mussel samples, and one bloody clam sample. Among the pandemic strains, eight belonged to serogroup O3:K6, three belonged to O1:K25, and one was O1:K untypeable. One hundred eighty-seven strains of V. parahaemolyticus were isolated from clinical specimens obtained from a hospital in this city during 2000 to 2001. The pandemic strains comprised 64 and 68% of the isolates in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Among the serotypes of the pandemic strains, O3:K6 was dominant at 73% in 2000 and 76% in 2001 followed by O1:K25 at 20% in 2000 and 13% in 2001. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of the pandemic strains from molluscan shellfish were indistinguishable or very similar to those of patient isolates. Similarity of the serotype distribution and DNA fingerprints occurring between the molluscan shellfish strains and clinical strains suggests that molluscan shellfish may be an important source of pandemic V. parahaemolyticus infection in southern Thailand. For public health, proper cooking of molluscan shellfish in this area is strongly recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133804     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

1.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its specific bacteriophages as an indicator in cockles (Anadara granosa) for the risk of V. parahaemolyticus infection in Southern Thailand.

Authors:  Mingkwan Yingkajorn; Natthawan Sermwitayawong; Prasit Palittapongarnpimp; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi; William P Robins; John J Mekalanos; Varaporn Vuddhakul
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Variability of properties of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from individual patients.

Authors:  Phuangthip Bhoopong; Prasit Palittapongarnpim; Rattanaruji Pomwised; Arpapak Kiatkittipong; Muhammad Kamruzzaman; Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi; Masanori Ishibashi; Varaporn Vuddhakul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Contamination by Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Its Virulent Strains in Seafood Marketed in Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2013-06-19

4.  Improvement of the quantitation method for the tdh (+) Vibrio parahaemolyticus in molluscan shellfish based on most-probable- number, immunomagnetic separation, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Authors:  Oscar Escalante-Maldonado; Ahmad Y Kayali; Wataru Yamazaki; Varaporn Vuddhakul; Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Incidence and prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olumide A Odeyemi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.