Literature DB >> 17133798

Prevalence of Salmonella in diverse environmental farm samples.

Andres Rodriguez1, Philipus Pangloli, Harold A Richards, John R Mount, F Ann Draughon.   

Abstract

The development of suitable intervention strategies to control Salmonella populations at the farm level requires reliable data on the occurrence and prevalence of the pathogen. Previous studies on Salmonella prevalence have focused on acquiring data from specific farm types and/or selected regions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of this pathogen across a variety of farm types and regions in order to generate comparative data from a diverse group of environmental samples. Farm samples (n = 2,496) were collected quarterly from 18 different farms across five states (Tennessee, North Carolina, Alabama, California, and Washington) over a 24-month period. The participating farms included beef and dairy cattle operations, swine production and farrowing facilities, and poultry farms (both broiler chicken and turkey). The samples were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella by means of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual methods optimized for farm samples. Salmonella isolates were characterized by automated riboprinting. Salmonella serovars were recovered from 4.7% of all samples. The majority of positive findings were isolated from swine farms (57.3%). The occurrence of Salmonella was lower on dairy farms (17.9%), poultry farms (16.2%), and beef cattle farms (8.5%). The most commonly isolated serovar was Salmonella Anatum (48.4%), which was isolated notably more frequently than the next most common Salmonella serovars, Arizonae (12.1%) and Javiana (8.8%). The results of this study suggest that significant reservoirs of Salmonella populations still exist on swine production facilities and to a lesser extent in other animal production facilities. Data showed that the surrounding farm environment could be an important source of contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133798     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  23 in total

1.  Landscape and meteorological factors affecting prevalence of three food-borne pathogens in fruit and vegetable farms.

Authors:  Laura K Strawn; Esther D Fortes; Elizabeth A Bihn; Kendra K Nightingale; Yrjö T Gröhn; Randy W Worobo; Martin Wiedmann; Peter W Bergholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Longitudinal study of distributions of similar antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella serovars in pigs and their environment in two distinct swine production systems.

Authors:  Shivaramu Keelara; H Morgan Scott; William M Morrow; Wondwossen A Gebreyes; Maria Correa; Rajesh Nayak; Rossina Stefanova; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Survival of Salmonella enterica in poultry feed is strain dependent.

Authors:  Ana Andino; Sean Pendleton; Nan Zhang; Wei Chen; Faith Critzer; Irene Hanning
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Salmonella enterica burden in harvest-ready cattle populations from the southern high plains of the United States.

Authors:  David J Kunze; Guy H Loneragan; Tammy M Platt; Mark F Miller; Thomas E Besser; Mohammad Koohmaraie; Tyler Stephens; Mindy M Brashears
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Salmonella in healthy pigs: prevalence, serotype diversity and antimicrobial resistance observed during 1998-1999 and 2004-2005 in Japan.

Authors:  K Futagawa-Saito; S Hiratsuka; M Kamibeppu; T Hirosawa; K Oyabu; T Fukuyasu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Longitudinal study of Salmonella dispersion and the role of environmental contamination in commercial swine production systems.

Authors:  Paul M Dorr; Daniel A Tadesse; Bayleyegn Molla Zewde; Pamela Fry; Siddhartha Thakur; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves.

Authors:  John B Kaneene; Lorin D Warnick; Carole A Bolin; Ronald J Erskine; Katherine May; Roseann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination on hides and carcasses of cull cattle presented for slaughter in the United States: an evaluation of prevalence and bacterial loads by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methods.

Authors:  Dayna M Brichta-Harhay; Michael N Guerini; Terrance M Arthur; Joseph M Bosilevac; Norasak Kalchayanand; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluating the effect of environmental factors on pathogen regrowth in compost extract.

Authors:  Jinkyung Kim; Marion W Shepherd; Xiuping Jiang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Antimicrobial resistant bacteria recovered from retail ground meat products in the US include a Raoultella ornithinolytica co-harboring blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-5.

Authors:  Gregory A Ballash; Amy L Albers; Dixie F Mollenkopf; Emily Sechrist; Rachael J Adams; Thomas E Wittum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.