Literature DB >> 17133393

Interparticipant correlations: a model free FMRI analysis technique.

Martin P Hejnar1, Kent A Kiehl, Vince D Calhoun.   

Abstract

FMRI analysis techniques can be broadly divided into model based and data driven techniques. The most widely used approach assumes an explicit temporal hemodynamic model based upon the experimental paradigm. Such an approach has proven very useful and powerful even though it is limited by the accuracy of the prespecified model. An alternative approach is to use data driven techniques like independent component analysis or fuzzy cluster analysis. These approaches have proven useful for exploratory analysis in a multivariate sense; however, they can present additional difficulties in the interpretation of the results. An alternative to these approaches is to take advantage of similarities in the patterns of the hemodynamics between participants [i.e., interparticipant correlation (IPC)]. This FMRI analysis technique enjoys the parsimony of the general linear model (GLM) but does not assume a specific FMRI time course. The technique consists of calculating voxel-wise correlations between participants resulting in IPC maps, which indicate the activated regions the participants have in common. We applied the IPC approach to data collected from healthy controls in an auditory oddball task. As expected, high inter-participant correlations were detected in auditory cortical regions in the temporal lobes where highest correlations were evident. In addition, areas that appear to be involved in the task were detected using IPC's but not the GLM regression. This technique, designed to have increased sensitivity to inter-subject correlations that are not necessarily task-related, may potentially be useful as a compliment to model-based approaches. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17133393      PMCID: PMC6871481          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  18 in total

1.  Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion.

Authors:  L Freire; J F Mangin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?

Authors:  L Freire; A Roche; J F Mangin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Discussion on the choice of separated components in fMRI data analysis by spatial independent component analysis.

Authors:  Huafu Chen; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses.

Authors:  Daniel A Handwerker; John M Ollinger; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Modeling hemodynamic response for analysis of functional MRI time-series.

Authors:  J C Rajapakse; F Kruggel; J M Maisog; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; O Josephs; G Rees; R Turner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; R Turner; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: a multivariate approach.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise?

Authors:  Martin J McKeown; Lars Kai Hansen; Terrence J Sejnowsk
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  17 in total

1.  Solving the brain synchrony eigenvalue problem: conservation of temporal dynamics (fMRI) over subjects doing the same task.

Authors:  S J Hanson; A D Gagliardi; C Hanson
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.

Authors:  Samuel A Nastase; Valeria Gazzola; Uri Hasson; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Inter-subject correlation of brain hemodynamic responses during watching a movie: localization in space and frequency.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.081

4.  Cortical Response Similarities Predict which Audiovisual Clips Individuals Viewed, but Are Unrelated to Clip Preference.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Cullen Roth; Cota Navin Gupta; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with FMRI.

Authors:  Annabel D Nijhof; Roel M Willems
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Functional Imaging of Autonomic Regulation: Methods and Key Findings.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Jennifer A Ogren; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Inter-subject correlation in fMRI: method validation against stimulus-model based analysis.

Authors:  Juha Pajula; Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Uni- and multisensory brain areas are synchronised across spectators when watching unedited dance recordings.

Authors:  Corinne Jola; Phil McAleer; Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Scott A Love; Gordon Morison; Frank E Pollick
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-06-03

10.  A method for multi-group inter-participant correlation: abnormal synchrony in patients with schizophrenia during auditory target detection.

Authors:  D Kim; G D Pearlson; K A Kiehl; E Bedrick; O Demirci; V D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.