Literature DB >> 17133059

Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin as an additive in Optisol-GS a preservation medium for corneal donor tissue.

David C Ritterband1, Mahendra K Shah, Seth W Meskin, Daniel E Shapiro, John A Seedor, Richard S Koplin, Dan Ning Hu, Syingfeng Shao, Patricia Dahl, Steven McCormick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the endothelial toxicity and the microbiological efficacy of moxifloxacin (250 microg/mL) as an additive to Optisol-GS.
METHODS: Five hundred nine donor rims were studied. One half of each donor rim was placed in standard Optisol-GS and the other half of the rim in Optisol-GS fortified with moxifloxacin (250 microg/mL). All rims were refrigerated for 24 hours at 3 degrees C and placed in thioglycolate broth and incubated at 37 degrees C for 7 days. One pair of donor buttons not used in transplantation stored in each solution was examined for endothelial changes by using electron microscopy (EM). A second pair of cornea buttons was examined for toxicity by endothelial staining with 0.3% trypan blue and 0.2% alizarin red. All endothelial cells that stained (nonviable cells) and nonstained cells (viable cells) were counted, and the ratio of nonviable cells was calculated.
RESULTS: The rate of culture-positive donor rims in the Optisol-GS group was 11.9% (61/509) and in the moxifloxacin-fortified Optisol-GS media was 2.5% (13/509). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01; chi test). There was no difference in the cellular morphology of the button stored in moxifloxacin-fortified Optisol-GS compared with Optisol-GS using EM. In the bioassay, the rate of nonviable cells in the moxifloxacin-fortified media compared with the control media was nonsignificant (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin (250 microg/mL) seems to be safe as an additive agent for cornea storage media. It significantly reduces the rate of positive rim cultures and shows no signs of endothelial cytotoxicity as viewed by EM and by a bioassay of trypan blue and alizarin red.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133059     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000220777.70981.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty transmitted from the same donor to two recipients confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Ana Paula Miyagusko Taba Oguido; Antonio Marcelo Barbante Casella; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Sergio Arruda Pacheco; Paulo José Martins Bispo; Fernanda Marques
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Incidence and Outcomes of Positive Donor Rim Cultures and Infections in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Shahzad I Mian; Anthony J Aldave; Elmer Y Tu; Brandon D Ayres; Bennie H Jeng; Marian S Macsai; Michael L Nordlund; Jeffrey G Penta; Sudeep Pramanik; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Wendi Liang; Maureen G Maguire; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  The value of corneoscleral rim cultures in keratoplasty: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Efstathia Kiatos; James J Armstrong; Cindy Ml Hutnik; Stephen M Tsioros; Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; William G Hodge
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  Prevalence of microbial contamination in donor corneas.

Authors:  Nan-Ni Chen; Pei-Lun Wu; Hung-Chi Chen; Tsung-Yu Huang; Li-Ju Lai
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.