A Thilmann1, A Nachtmann, A Scharff. 1. Neurologische Abteilung, Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Auf der Rötsch 2, 45219 Essen, Germany. t@drthilmann.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A new measurement instrument was developed to combine common scores with the parameter of effort for rehabilitation, the latter being a control instrument for medical professionals and rehabilitational health organisations. METHODS: The Neurological Rehabilitation Score (NRS) contains 61 items (including the ten from the Barthel Index) resulting in scores of 0 (worst patient condition) to 600 (best). The items are grouped into seven categories: activities of daily life (13), mobility (8), communication and social skills (7), arm and hand function (7), orientation and cognition skills (10), strength and pain (8), and coping and miscellaneous (8). We investigated 8,139 patients and determined reliability (kappa statistic) and responsivity (standardised response means). In 100 consecutive patients, we also measured the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) to address validity. RESULTS: With an average kappa value of 0.86 (range 0.62-0.98), the NRS showed excellent inter-rater reliability. There was a good correlation between NRS, FIM, and SSS. Response was good at 0.84. The ceiling effect was also less than 1%, compared to 17% in the Barthel Index. CONCLUSION: The NRS was shown to be effective for evaluation of outcome and expenditure in neurological rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: A new measurement instrument was developed to combine common scores with the parameter of effort for rehabilitation, the latter being a control instrument for medical professionals and rehabilitational health organisations. METHODS: The Neurological Rehabilitation Score (NRS) contains 61 items (including the ten from the Barthel Index) resulting in scores of 0 (worst patient condition) to 600 (best). The items are grouped into seven categories: activities of daily life (13), mobility (8), communication and social skills (7), arm and hand function (7), orientation and cognition skills (10), strength and pain (8), and coping and miscellaneous (8). We investigated 8,139 patients and determined reliability (kappa statistic) and responsivity (standardised response means). In 100 consecutive patients, we also measured the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) to address validity. RESULTS: With an average kappa value of 0.86 (range 0.62-0.98), the NRS showed excellent inter-rater reliability. There was a good correlation between NRS, FIM, and SSS. Response was good at 0.84. The ceiling effect was also less than 1%, compared to 17% in the Barthel Index. CONCLUSION: The NRS was shown to be effective for evaluation of outcome and expenditure in neurological rehabilitation.
Authors: P U Heuschmann; P L Kolominsky-Rabas; C H Nolte; G Hünermund; H-U Ruf; I Laumeier; R Meyrer; T Alberti; A Rahmann; T Kurth; K Berger Journal: Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 0.752
Authors: P U Heuschmann; P L Kolominsky-Rabas; B Misselwitz; P Hermanek; C Leffmann; G M Von Reutern; L Lachenmayer; H J Bücker-Nott; K Berger Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Date: 2004-02-13 Impact factor: 0.628
Authors: J C Hobart; D L Lamping; J A Freeman; D W Langdon; D L McLellan; R J Greenwood; A J Thompson Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-08-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ryanne J M Lemmens; Annick A A Timmermans; Yvonne J M Janssen-Potten; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 2.474