Literature DB >> 17130413

Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study.

Vivien H Lee1, Robert D Brown, Jayawant N Mandrekar, Bahram Mokri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates for internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) have been reported to be 2.6 to 2.9 per 100,000, but reliable epidemiologic data for vertebral artery dissection (VAD) are not available.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence rate of cervical artery dissection (CAD) in a defined population.
METHODS: With IRB approval, we used the medical record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify all patients diagnosed with spontaneous ICAD and VAD for the period of 1987-2003 in Olmsted County, MN.
RESULTS: Of 48 patients with CAD, there were 32 patients with ICAD and 18 patients with VAD. In Olmsted County, the average annual incidence rate for ICAD was 1.72 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.13 to 2.32) and for VAD 0.97 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.4). The average annual incidence rate for CAD was 2.6 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.86 to 3.33). The most frequently encountered symptoms in CAD were head or neck pain (80%), cerebral ischemia (TIA or infarct) (56%), and Horner syndrome (25%). Good outcome (defined as modified Rankin score of 0 to 2) was seen in 92% of patients. No recurrence of dissection was observed during a mean 7.8 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Internal carotid artery dissection was detected approximately twice as frequently as vertebral artery dissection in the overall study, but in the latter half of the study period, vertebral artery and internal carotid artery dissection incidence rates were equivalent. The majority of cervical artery dissection patients in the community have excellent outcome, and contrary to many tertiary referral series, re-dissection is rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17130413     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  109 in total

1.  Cervical vertebral artery dissection and recurrent in-stent stenosis due to C6/7 foraminal spondylosis.

Authors:  S Fischer; C Schul; P Lanzer; H Henkes
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Spontaneous recanalization of internal carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  Lidija Tuskan-Mohar; Marko Legac; Marina Bralic; Berislav Budiselic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Neuro-Ophthalmological Emergencies.

Authors:  João Lemos; Eric Eggenberger
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-10

4.  Cervical Artery Dissection: A Review of the Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Outcome.

Authors:  Christina A Blum; Shadi Yaghi
Journal:  Arch Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-17

Review 5.  Headache in Intracranial and Cervical Artery Dissections.

Authors:  Huma U Sheikh
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-02

Review 6.  Prognosis of carotid dissecting aneurysms: Results from CADISS and a systematic review.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Alice King; Jeremy Madigan; Christopher Levi; John W Norris; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Isolated brachiocephalic artery dissection presenting as acute stroke.

Authors:  Hariharasudan Mani; Sharat Ahluwalia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-27

Review 8.  Horner's syndrome, Pseudo-Horner's syndrome, and simple anisocoria.

Authors:  Timothy J Martin
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Misdiagnosis of Cervicocephalic Artery Dissection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Ava L Liberman; Babak B Navi; Charles C Esenwa; Cenai Zhang; Justin Song; Natalie T Cheng; Daniel L Labovitz; Hooman Kamel; Alexander E Merkler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences.

Authors:  Noortje A M M Maaijwee; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Pauline Schaapsmeerders; Ewoud J van Dijk; Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.