Literature DB >> 17130383

Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes.

Simon Gilbody1, Peter Bower, Janine Fletcher, David Richards, Alex J Sutton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in primary care but is suboptimally managed. Collaborative care, that is, structured care involving a greater role of nonmedical specialists to augment primary care, has emerged as a potentially effective candidate intervention to improve quality of primary care and patient outcomes.
METHODS: To quantify the short-term and longer-term effectiveness of collaborative care compared with standard care and to understand mechanisms of action by exploring between-study heterogeneity, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that compared collaborative care with usual primary care in patients with depression. We searched MEDLINE (from the beginning of 1966), EMBASE (from the beginning of 1980), CINAHL (from the beginning of 1980), PsycINFO (from the beginning of 1980), the Cochrane Library (from the beginning of 1966), and DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness) (from the beginning of 1985) databases from study inception to February 6, 2006.
RESULTS: We found 37 randomized studies including 12 355 patients with depression receiving primary care. Random effects meta-analysis showed that depression outcomes were improved at 6 months (standardized mean difference, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.32), and evidence of longer-term benefit was found for up to 5 years (standardized mean difference, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.31). When exploring determinants of effectiveness, effect size was directly related to medication compliance and to the professional background and method of supervision of case managers. The addition of brief psychotherapy did not substantially improve outcome, nor did increased numbers of sessions. Cumulative meta-analysis showed that sufficient evidence had emerged by 2000 to demonstrate the statistically significant benefit of collaborative care.
CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care is more effective than standard care in improving depression outcomes in the short and longer terms. Future research needs to address the implementation of collaborative care, particularly in settings other than the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17130383     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  456 in total

1.  Effective Implementation of collaborative care for depression: what is needed?

Authors:  Robin R Whitebird; Leif I Solberg; Nancy A Jaeckels; Pamela B Pietruszewski; Senka Hadzic; Jürgen Unützer; Kris A Ohnsorg; Rebecca C Rossom; Arne Beck; Kenneth E Joslyn; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Ten-year trends in quality of care and spending for depression: 1996 through 2005.

Authors:  Catherine A Fullerton; Alisa B Busch; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Thomas G McGuire; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12

3.  Enhancing the clinical utility of depression screening.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Systematic review of intervention practices for depression in the workplace.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; William H Gnam; Nancy Carnide; Emma Irvin; Benjamin C Amick; Kelly DeRango; Robert McMaster; Kimberley Cullen; Tesha Slack; Sandra Brouwer; Ute Bültmann
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

5.  Implementation of primary care-mental health integration services in the Veterans Health Administration: program activity and associations with engagement in specialty mental health services.

Authors:  Laura O Wray; Benjamin R Szymanski; Lisa K Kearney; John F McCarthy
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2012-03

6.  Lessons learned in developing community mental health care in Europe.

Authors:  Maya Semrau; Elizabeth A Barley; Ann Law; Graham Thornicroft
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  Moving medical advances from prototype into practice.

Authors:  Bruce L Rollman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Partnership research: a practical trial design for evaluation of a natural experiment to improve depression care.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; Russell E Glasgow; Jürgen Unützer; Nancy Jaeckels; Gary Oftedahl; Arne Beck; Michael V Maciosek; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Evidence for the management of adolescent depression.

Authors:  R Eric Lewandowski; Mary C Acri; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Mark Olfson; Greg Clarke; William Gardner; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Sepheen Byron; Kelly Kelleher; Harold A Pincus; Samantha Frank; Sarah M Horwitz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.