Literature DB >> 17129953

Arsenic concentrations and bacterial contamination in a pilot shallow dugwell program in West Bengal, India.

Meera M Hira-Smith1, Yan Yuan, Xavier Savarimuthu, Jane Liaw, Alpana Hira, Cynthia Green, Timir Hore, Protap Chakraborty, Ondine S von Ehrenstein, Allan H Smith.   

Abstract

Project Well has developed a pilot self-supporting community-based mitigation program to provide arsenic-safe water to the villagers of North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. Shallow concrete dugwells, less than 25 feet deep, that tap into an unconfined aquifer are constructed following stipulated guidelines. The design differs from the traditional dugwell in two major ways: (i) there is a layer of coarse sand in the annular space enveloping the outer wall of the concrete cylinder; and (ii) handpumps are used for water extraction to reduce the potential for bacterial contamination. Monitoring programs for arsenic and coliform bacteria in selected dugwells have been completed. In summer, when the water levels were low, the arsenic concentrations were measured. In 11 wells, measured over three years, the average water arsenic concentration was 29 micro gL-1. Two dugwells had high concentrations of arsenic (average 152 micro gL-1 and 61 micro gL-1), but the remaining nine dugwells had an overall average of 11 micro gL-1. Seasonal variation was assessed in five wells with monthly measurements and there was a direct relationship between increases in arsenic concentrations and decreases in the volume of water in the dugwells in the dry summer season. To control bacterial contamination, sodium hypochlorite solution containing 5% chlorine was applied once a month. In 2005, fecal coliform was undetected in 65% (n = 13) of the dugwells but detected at high levels in 35% (n = 7) of the dugwells. The program clearly reduced exposure to arsenic, but we conclude that further study of increases in arsenic concentrations in the dry season are warranted, as well as assessment of ways to more effectively control bacterial contamination such as more frequent chlorination, perhaps with lower doses on each occasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17129953     DOI: 10.1080/10934520601015834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng        ISSN: 1093-4529            Impact factor:   2.269


  4 in total

Review 1.  Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation.

Authors:  Shiv Shankar; Uma Shanker
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14

2.  Seeking evidence of multidisciplinarity in environmental geochemistry and health: an analysis of arsenic in drinking water research.

Authors:  Abiodun D Aderibigbe; Alex G Stewart; Andrew S Hursthouse
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  A low-cost method to identify tubewells for longitudinal research on arsenic in groundwater.

Authors:  Jonathan D Sugimoto; Salahuddin Ahmad; Mahbubur Rashid; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Alain B Labrique
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  Fecal contamination of drinking-water in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert Bain; Ryan Cronk; Jim Wright; Hong Yang; Tom Slaymaker; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.