Literature DB >> 17129749

Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.

Emily Pronin1.   

Abstract

Human judgment and decision making is distorted by an array of cognitive, perceptual and motivational biases. Recent evidence suggests that people tend to recognize (and even overestimate) the operation of bias in human judgment - except when that bias is their own. Aside from the general motive to self-enhance, two primary sources of this 'bias blind spot' have been identified. One involves people's heavy weighting of introspective evidence when assessing their own bias, despite the tendency for bias to occur nonconsciously. The other involves people's conviction that their perceptions directly reflect reality, and that those who see things differently are therefore biased. People's tendency to deny their own bias, even while recognizing bias in others, reveals a profound shortcoming in self-awareness, with important consequences for interpersonal and intergroup conflict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17129749     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  24 in total

Review 1.  Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  What Does 'Unpaid Consultant' Signify? A Survey of Euphemistic Language in Conflict of Interest Declarations.

Authors:  David B Menkes; Jill D Masters; Angela Bröring; Alan Blum
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Toward trustworthy, useful and independent guidelines - acknowledging conflicts when they exist.

Authors:  Aaron M Tejani; Thomas L Perry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Neural segregation of objective and contextual aspects of fairness.

Authors:  Nicholas D Wright; Mkael Symmonds; Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Bias in Rating of Rodent Distress during Anesthesia Induction for Anesthesia Compared with Euthanasia.

Authors:  Brittany A Baker; Debra L Hickman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  How patients and clinicians make meaning of physical suffering in mental health evaluations.

Authors:  Nicholas J Carson; Arlene M Katz; Margarita Alegría
Journal:  Transcult Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-26

7.  The phenomenology and neurobiology of delusion formation during psychosis onset: Jaspers, Truman symptoms, and aberrant salience.

Authors:  Aaron L Mishara; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Paul D Frederick; Heidi D Nelson; Patricia A Carney; Tad T Brunyé; Kimberly H Allison; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Commercial influence and learner-perceived bias in continuing medical education.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Christy K Boscardin; Leslie Aguayo; Robert B Baron
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Asymmetric memory for harming versus being harmed.

Authors:  Chelsea Helion; Erik G Helzer; Suzie Kim; David A Pizarro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.