Literature DB >> 1712957

Quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: a randomized, cross-over study.

M A Oto1, H Müderrisoglu, M B Ozin, M E Korkmaz, A Karamehmetoglu, A Oram, E Oram, S Ugurlu.   

Abstract

Eleven patients with rate responsive pacemakers (7 men, 4 women, mean age 41 years with a range of 23-60) were randomly assigned to a cross-over study in order to assess their overall exercise capacity and quality-of-life (QOL) scores. All of the pacemakers were implanted for complete AV block or sick sinus syndrome. The pacemakers were randomly programmed into VVI or rate responsive (VVIR) pacing modes for 3-week study periods in each mode. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed and the QOL was evaluated by the "Hacettepe Quality-of-Life Questionnaire". All patients exercised longer in the VVIR mode (mean 10.54 +/- 0.73 min) than in the VVI mode (mean 7.81 +/- 0.62 min) (P less than 0.05). QOL scores were also found to be significantly higher in the VVIR mode (mean 173.81 +/- 16.22 points) compared to the VVI mode (mean 156.27 +/- 21.22 points) (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that VVIR pacing offers a better QOL in addition to an improved exercise capacity, compared to the single chamber nonrate modulated pacing (VVI).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1712957     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04110.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  [Change in quality-of-life and mood through pacemaker implantation: a follow-up study].

Authors:  C Leopold; B E Müller; R Schandry
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-06

2.  How different from pacemaker patients are recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with respect to psychosocial adaptation, affective disorders, and quality of life?

Authors:  F Duru; S Büchi; R Klaghofer; H Mattmann; T Sensky; C Buddeberg; R Candinas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Oxygen uptake kinetics during low intensity exercise: relevance for rate adaptive pacemaker programming.

Authors:  T Lewalter; H Rickli; D MacCarter; W Jung; R Schimpf; P Schwartze; R Candinas; B Lüderitz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Systematic trial of pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (STOP-AF).

Authors:  R G Charles; J M McComb
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Atrioventricular Nodal Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión; Karina Elizabeth Scavenius; Laura B García; Luis Miño; Judith Torales; Orlando Sequeira
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30

6.  "Value" of improved treadmill exercise capacity: lessons from a study of rate responsive pacing.

Authors:  A D Staniforth; R Andrews; M Harrison; A Perry; A J Cowley
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.