BACKGROUND: Clinicians often obtain a panel of lipids but then only use low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to make clinical decisions. We previously described the multiple lipid measure, a strategy that integrates information about seven lipid measures. Our current inquiry uses the multiple lipid measure to create a scoring system and validates that system in a second cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A scoring system that uses total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides was developed and tested. African-American participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study were used to validate the multiple lipid measure score. For nonsmokers, scores > or = 2 had a hazard ratio of 4.25 (95% CI 1.92-9.40) compared to reference scores of < or = -3 in adjusted survival analysis predicting incident coronary heart disease risk in the ARIC. The best conventional single lipid measure for nonsmokers was LDL cholesterol. Compared to LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, those with LDL cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl had a hazard ratio of 2.31 (95% CI 1.13-4.75). For current smokers, the best conventional lipid measure was the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, which was similar in predictive ability to the multiple lipid measure score. However, the multiple lipid measure score predicted an additional 10% of the cohort at risk compared to the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the multiple lipid scoring system improves the assessment of incident coronary heart disease risk and may have utility for clinicians in integrating lipid values.
BACKGROUND: Clinicians often obtain a panel of lipids but then only use low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to make clinical decisions. We previously described the multiple lipid measure, a strategy that integrates information about seven lipid measures. Our current inquiry uses the multiple lipid measure to create a scoring system and validates that system in a second cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A scoring system that uses total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides was developed and tested. African-American participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study were used to validate the multiple lipid measure score. For nonsmokers, scores > or = 2 had a hazard ratio of 4.25 (95% CI 1.92-9.40) compared to reference scores of < or = -3 in adjusted survival analysis predicting incident coronary heart disease risk in the ARIC. The best conventional single lipid measure for nonsmokers was LDL cholesterol. Compared to LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, those with LDL cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl had a hazard ratio of 2.31 (95% CI 1.13-4.75). For current smokers, the best conventional lipid measure was the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, which was similar in predictive ability to the multiple lipid measure score. However, the multiple lipid measure score predicted an additional 10% of the cohort at risk compared to the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the multiple lipid scoring system improves the assessment of incident coronary heart disease risk and may have utility for clinicians in integrating lipid values.
Authors: A J Moss; R E Goldstein; V J Marder; C E Sparks; D Oakes; H Greenberg; H J Weiss; W Zareba; M W Brown; C S Liang; E Lichstein; W C Little; J A Gillespie; L Van Voorhees; R J Krone; M M Bodenheimer; J Hochman; E M Dwyer; R Arora; F I Marcus; L F Watelet; R B Case Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-05-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B Lamarche; S Moorjani; P J Lupien; B Cantin; P M Bernard; G R Dagenais; J P Després Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E J Schaefer; S Lamon-Fava; J M Ordovas; S D Cohn; M M Schaefer; W P Castelli; P W Wilson Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.922