Literature DB >> 17127600

The importance of total cardiovascular risk assessment in clinical practice.

Ian M Graham1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Third Joint European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Prevention highlight the importance of total cardiovascular risk prediction in planning preventive strategies. AIM: To review the development of risk prediction systems in Europe and the practicalities of utilizing risk prediction in everyday clinical practice.
METHODS: Randomised clinical trials, cohort studies and current guidelines for the management of cardiovascular risk were reviewed. Relevant articles published between 1960 and 2004 were identified on PubMed and the Internet.
RESULTS: Several risk factors have been confirmed as major independent predictors of CVD, with their modification reducing cardiovascular risk. Total risk assessment is essential as multiple risk factors confer greater risk than the sum of their components. Framingham Heart Study data have been used as the basis for several risk prediction systems, which have been incorporated into numerous guidelines. However, these data are from a relatively small American cohort and tend to overestimate risk in some European populations. This and other limitations prompted the development of the SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) risk charts using a much larger dataset from 12 European cohort studies. An electronic version of the charts, HeartScore, is now available to provide practitioners with an interactive risk prediction and management system that can be tailored to individual countries.
CONCLUSION: Evidence-based risk assessment systems can facilitate logical, individually tailored risk management and contribute to better patient care. Secular changes in coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence and mortality as well as in risk factors such as obesity and diabetes mean that such systems should be capable of modification and evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17127600     DOI: 10.1080/13814780600976282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract        ISSN: 1381-4788            Impact factor:   1.904


  9 in total

1.  Cardiologists' charting varied by risk factor, and was often discordant with patient report.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely-Witte; Donna E Stewart; Neville Suskin; Lyall Higginson; David A Alter; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Blood pressure and global risk assessment in a Swedish population.

Authors:  Jenny Eckner; Charlotte A Larsson; Lennart Råstam; Ulf Lindblad
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 3.  Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Cardiovascular Risk Marker May Be Less Efficient in Women Than in Men.

Authors:  Ljiljana Trtica Majnarić; Silva Guljaš; Zvonimir Bosnić; Vatroslav Šerić; Thomas Wittlinger
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-02

Review 4.  Addressing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases; Need for Scalable and Sustainable Frameworks.

Authors:  Shanthi Mendis; Ian Graham; Jagat Narula
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2022-07-29

5.  An epistemic community comes and goes? Local and national expressions of heart health promotion in Canada.

Authors:  John Eyles; Kerry Robinson; Susan Elliott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Cardiovascular risk and aging: the need for a more comprehensive understanding.

Authors:  Ljiljana Trtica Majnarić; Zvonimir Bosnić; Tomislav Kurevija; Thomas Wittlinger
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.189

7.  Sympathovagal imbalance contributes to prehypertension status and cardiovascular risks attributed by insulin resistance, inflammation, dyslipidemia and oxidative stress in first degree relatives of type 2 diabetics.

Authors:  Gopal Krushna Pal; Chandrasekaran Adithan; Palghat Hariharan Ananthanarayanan; Pravati Pal; Nivedita Nanda; Thiyagarajan Durgadevi; Venugopal Lalitha; Avupati Naga Syamsunder; Tarun Kumar Dutta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Physical Activity Level Improves the Predictive Accuracy of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score: The ATTICA Study (2002-2012).

Authors:  Ekavi N Georgousopoulou; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Dimitrios Bougatsas; Michael Chatzigeorgiou; Stavros A Kavouras; Christina Chrysohoou; Ioannis Skoumas; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Christos Pitsavos
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-09

9.  Perceived Preparedness of Health Care Students for Providing Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Monica Zolezzi; Oraib Abdallah; Suad Aden; Stella Major; Diana White; Alla El-Awaisi
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.