BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This retrospective study compares individual MRI based 3D treatment planning for each intracavitary applicator insertion and the use of only one MRI treatment plan for cervical cancer brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GTV, high risk (HR) CTV and OAR were delineated and analysed for 14 patients. Data using the individual approach were taken from the actual irradiated plans. The "single plan procedure" was simulated by matching the dose distribution of the first plan to the MRI datasets of each subsequent implantation. Total doses from brachytherapy were added up and normalized to 2Gy fractionation (EQD2). RESULTS: The mean D90 for HR CTV was 6Gy higher when using one plan than when using individual treatment plans. The D(2cc) increased 3.5Gy for the bladder, 4.2Gy for the rectum and 5.8Gy for the sigmoid. The use of only one treatment plan would have resulted in 2, 1 and 5 extra cases exceeding total D(2cc) constraints for bladder (90Gy), rectum (75Gy) and sigmoid (75Gy), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of only one treatment plan for several applications results in higher dose to target and OAR structures. CT, clinical examination and X-ray findings can help to reduce certain situations of overdosage, when individual MRI based treatment planning is not available for each fraction.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This retrospective study compares individual MRI based 3D treatment planning for each intracavitary applicator insertion and the use of only one MRI treatment plan for cervical cancer brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GTV, high risk (HR) CTV and OAR were delineated and analysed for 14 patients. Data using the individual approach were taken from the actual irradiated plans. The "single plan procedure" was simulated by matching the dose distribution of the first plan to the MRI datasets of each subsequent implantation. Total doses from brachytherapy were added up and normalized to 2Gy fractionation (EQD2). RESULTS: The mean D90 for HR CTV was 6Gy higher when using one plan than when using individual treatment plans. The D(2cc) increased 3.5Gy for the bladder, 4.2Gy for the rectum and 5.8Gy for the sigmoid. The use of only one treatment plan would have resulted in 2, 1 and 5 extra cases exceeding total D(2cc) constraints for bladder (90Gy), rectum (75Gy) and sigmoid (75Gy), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of only one treatment plan for several applications results in higher dose to target and OAR structures. CT, clinical examination and X-ray findings can help to reduce certain situations of overdosage, when individual MRI based treatment planning is not available for each fraction.
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Gertrude Schirl; Anja Baldinger; Thomas H Helbich; Richard Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Nicole Nesvacil; Kari Tanderup; Taran P Hellebust; Astrid De Leeuw; Stefan Lang; Sandy Mohamed; Swamidas V Jamema; Clare Anderson; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Peter Petrow; Kari Tanderup; Primoz Petric; Daniel Berger; Christian Kirisits; Erik M Pedersen; Erik van Limbergen; Christine Haie-Meder; Richard Pötter Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 6.280