Literature DB >> 17126774

Gender differences between predicted and measured propofol C(P50) for loss of consciousness.

Mitsuharu Kodaka1, Toshinari Suzuki, Akihiko Maeyama, Kaoru Koyama, Hideki Miyao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate gender differences in the effective dose of 50% for loss of consciousness (C(P50LOC)) for propofol using Diprifusor, the most commonly used target-controlled infusion system.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: 50 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 20 to 50 years, scheduled for minor surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups of 25 patients each. A target-controlled infusion of propofol (Diprifusor) was maintained at a predetermined target concentration. After a 10-minute steady state, blinded investigators evaluated patients' consciousness using verbal commands. The propofol test concentration was predetermined using a modified version of Dixon's up-and-down method (starting at 2.5 mug/mL; step size of 0.1 microg/mL). MEASUREMENT: Predicted and measured C(P50LOC) values and bispectral index (BIS) were obtained by averaging the crossover midpoint (ie, consciousness to unconsciousness). Those values were analyzed by unpaired t test: P < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The predicted C(P50LOC) for men was 2.14 +/- 0.10 microg/mL, which was lower than that for women, 2.55 +/- 0.11 microg/mL (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found for measured C(P50LOC) in men (2.37 +/- 0.41 microg/mL) and in women (2.30 +/- 0.28 microg/mL) or for BIS measurements.
CONCLUSION: Predicted C(P50LOC) by Diprifusor for men tended to be underestimated; that for women tended to be overestimated. Our data support a review of Diprifusor (Astra Zeneca, Osaka, Japan) pharmacokinetic parameters to avoid awareness during operation, particularly for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17126774     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

1.  High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of propofol in human plasma: comparison of different heteroscedastic calibration curve models.

Authors:  Pooria Taghavi Moghaddam; Mohammad Reza Pipelzadeh; Sholeh Nesioonpour; Nader Saki; Saeed Rezaee
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2014-08-10

2.  The effects of sevoflurane with propofol and remifentanil on tracheal intubation conditions without neuromuscular blocking agents.

Authors:  Wook Jong Kim; Seong Soo Choi; Doo Hwan Kim; Hye Jeong Seo; Eun Ha Suk; Seung Woo Ku; Pyung Hwan Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-08-20

3.  Female Patients Require a Higher Propofol Infusion Rate for Sedation.

Authors:  Shigeru Maeda; Yumiko Tomoyasu; Hitoshi Higuchi; Yuka Honda; Minako Ishii-Maruhama; Takuya Miyawaki
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Sex as a Biological Variable in Emergency Medicine Research and Clinical Practice: A Brief Narrative Review.

Authors:  Alyson J McGregor; Gillian A Beauchamp; Charles R Wira; Sarah M Perman; Basmah Safdar
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-06

5.  Effect of sex and polymorphisms of CYP2B6 and UGT1A9 on the difference between the target-controlled infusion predicted and measured plasma propofol concentration.

Authors:  Ai Fujita; Kengo Hayamizu; Tatsuya Yoshihara; Masayoshi Zaitsu; Fumie Shiraishi; Hisatomi Arima; Kazumasa Matsuo; Kanako Shiokawa; Hidekazu Setoguchi; Toshiyuki Sasaguri
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2018-08-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.