Literature DB >> 17126647

Effect of gender on prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndromes.

Ruchira Glaser1, Faith Selzer, Alice K Jacobs, Warren K Laskey, Sheryl F Kelsey, Elizabeth M Holper, Howard A Cohen, J Dawn Abbott, Robert L Wilensky.   

Abstract

Women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTACSs) may have better outcomes than men, but the effect of NSTACSs in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been examined. We performed a prospective, multicenter, cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent PCI for NSTACS and stable angina during 3 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry recruitment waves (1997 to 2002) to examine the effect of female gender on adverse clinical events after PCI or stable angina for NSTACS. The primary end point was the combined rate of death, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for cardiac causes at 1 year. Compared with men with NSTACS (n = 2,124), women (n = 1,338) were older and more often had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and history of heart failure (p <0.001 for all), whereas multivessel disease was less frequent (p <0.01). Procedural success and in-hospital adverse event rates were similar. Women with NSTACS had the highest 1-year rate of death/myocardial infarction/cardiac rehospitalization compared with women with stable angina pectoris (n = 462) or men (n = 995; women with NSTACS 37.6%, men with NSTACS 29.8%, women with stable angina 29.4%, men with stable angina 27.7%, p <0.001). The higher rate remained after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.56). Among women, NSTACS conferred a significantly higher risk for adverse events compared with stable angina (adjusted hazard ratio 1.41, p = 0.001), whereas the risk of adverse events was not different in men (adjusted hazard ratio 1.05, p = 0.5). In conclusion, women undergoing PCI for NSTACS have a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events than men or women undergoing PCI for stable angina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17126647     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Gender gap in acute coronary heart disease: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Mette Claassen; Kirsten C Sybrandy; Yolande E Appelman; Folkert W Asselbergs
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-26

2.  The effect of cardiac geometry variation according to sex and race on outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Edward T Ha; Marc Cohen; Theodore J Gaeta; Manish A Parikh; Stephen J Peterson; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2021-07-19

Review 3.  An Update on Gender Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease Care.

Authors:  Tina Shah; Nicolas Palaskas; Ameera Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  [Percutaneous coronary angioplasty in women: clinical, procedural and prognostic features].

Authors:  Leila Abid; Morched Hadrich; Mohamed Sahnoun; Samir Kammoun
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2011-08-24

5.  Gender differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: an insight from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Authors:  Yohei Numasawa; Shun Kohsaka; Hiroaki Miyata; Shigetaka Noma; Masahiro Suzuki; Shiro Ishikawa; Iwao Nakamura; Yutaro Nishi; Takahiro Ohki; Koji Negishi; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Assessing Risk in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease: When Should We Intensify Care and Follow-Up? Results from a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies of the COURAGE and FAME Era.

Authors:  Umberto Barbero; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Freek Nijhoff; Claudio Moretti; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Marco Mennuni; Davide Capodanno; Marco Lococo; Michael J Lipinski; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 7.  Women and Ischemic Heart Disease: Recognition, Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Seong-Mi Park; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Sex Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Insights From the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Tobias Heer; Matthias Hochadel; Karin Schmidt; Julinda Mehilli; Ralf Zahn; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Hamm; Michael Böhm; Georg Ertl; Hans Martin Hoffmeister; Stefan Sack; Jochen Senges; Steffen Massberg; Anselm K Gitt; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Sex differences in long-term outcomes of coronary patients treated with drug-eluting stents at a tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas; Gail A Shammas; Michael Jerin; Peter Sharis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 10.  Gender difference in clinical outcomes of the patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaya Guo; Fahui Yin; Chunlei Fan; Zhilu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.