Literature DB >> 17126272

Use of a non-contact 3D digitiser to measure the volume of keloid scars: a useful tool for scar assessment.

Ben Taylor1, D Angus McGrouther, Ardeshir Bayat.   

Abstract

Keloid scars often fail to respond to treatment, so research into new therapeutic regimes is important. However, research is limited by a scarcity of reliable, objective scar assessment tools. The volume of a keloid scar should decrease with successful treatment. This study demonstrates the use of a non-contact 3D digitiser to measure digitally the volume of a keloid scar. The scanner was used to scan 62 keloid scars and one fine-line normal scar. The scan took approximately 9s to complete. The volume was measured using 3D reverse modelling software. A previously validated scar assessment scale was used to score the scars according to their physical parameters. A significant correlation was found between volume and the scar score (Pearson's r=0.627, p<0.001). Linear regression was also statistically significant (p<0.001, R(2)=0.44). Therefore it was possible to predict the scar score from the measured volume. This technique could allow monitoring of a patient on treatment, or comparison of treatments in a research setting. It overcomes previous problems with the measurement of scar volume as it is quantitatively objective and well-tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17126272     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.

Authors:  Regina Fearmonti; Jennifer Bond; Detlev Erdmann; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-06-21

2.  5-fu for problematic scarring: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Ibrahim; R S Chalhoub
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-06-30

3.  Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.

Authors:  Jin Kyung Chae; Jeong Hee Kim; Eun Jung Kim; Kun Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 4.  Perforator-based flaps for the treatment of burn scar contractures: a review.

Authors:  C M Stekelenburg; R E Marck; P D H M Verhaegen; K W Marck; P P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 5.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.