Literature DB >> 17126128

Axillary cannulation for proximal aortic surgery is as safe in the emergent setting as in elective cases.

Jason M Budde1, Daniel L Serna, Susan C Osborne, Mark A Steele, Edward P Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right axillary artery cannulation and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SCP) have become well-described strategies in the surgical treatment of proximal aortic disease. Many series report increases in adverse outcomes with SCP used in emergent settings. We compare outcomes in elective and emergent patients.
METHODS: Over 21 months, SCP through right axillary cannulation with a side graft was performed in 61 patients. Thirty-three percent (20 of 61) underwent emergent operation for Stanford type A dissection or intramural hematoma, including 3 of 20 (4.7%) with pericardial tamponade; the remainder of SCP (41 of 61) was elective. The mean follow-up was 9.1 +/- 0.40 months.
RESULTS: Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 20 of 22 emergent cases (91%), with 2 unsuccessful cannulation attempts, and no peripheral arterial dissections encountered. The SCP flows averaged 16.3 +/- 0.71 cc x kg(-1) x min(-1) for a mean perfusion period of 26.1 +/- 1.9 minutes. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time for all patients was 173 +/- 11 minutes. Average hospital stay was 8.1 +/- 0.80 days. One case (1.3%) of permanent and 3 cases (4.8%) of temporary neurologic dysfunction occurred in SCP patients. The hospital mortality rate for emergent SCP cases (2 of 20, 10%) was not statistically different from the mortality rate for elective SCP cases (3 of 41, 7.3%, p = not significant), with no difference in complication rates. All 3 SCP patients with preoperative tamponade survived without complication. Cerebral oximetry data showed a trend toward decreased left-sided (contralateral) scalp perfusion. There was no association of emergent status with neurologic dysfunction, death, or any other adverse outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Axillary cannulation and SCP in the surgical treatment of proximal aortic pathology is safe in both elective and emergent settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17126128     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  eComment. Acute aortic dissection type A: which strategy of the arterial perfusion to choose?

Authors:  Leo A Bockeria; Anatoliy I Malashenkov; Sergey V Rychin
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06

2.  Right Axillary Artery Cannulation in Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Mitsuharu Hosono; Toshihiko Shibata; Takashi Murakami; Masanori Sakaguchi; Yasuo Suehiro; Shigefumi Suehiro
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery.

Authors:  William B Keeling; Bradley G Leshnower; Vinod H Thourani; Patrick S Kilgo; Edward P Chen
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-03

Review 4.  Shaggy and calcified aorta: surgical implications.

Authors:  Ikuo Fukuda; Kazuyuki Daitoku; Masahito Minakawa; Wakako Fukuda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-13

Review 5.  The Role of Deep Hypothermia in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Radosław Gocoł; Damian Hudziak; Jarosław Bis; Konrad Mendrala; Łukasz Morkisz; Paweł Podsiadło; Sylweriusz Kosiński; Jacek Piątek; Tomasz Darocha
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Combined femoral and axillary perfusion strategy for Stanford type a aortic dissection repair.

Authors:  Ling-Chen Huang; Qi-Chen Xu; Dao-Zhong Chen; Xiao-Fu Dai; Liang-Wan Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.